Evolution - August 2000
By Author

Starting: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 18:23:37 EDT
Ending: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:35 EDT

• Bertvan@aol.com
  • ID vs.? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 14:31:15 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 09:30:19 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 15:56:08 EDT)
  • ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 14:57:17 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 14:39:29 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 09:10:21 EDT)
  • ID vs ? (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 14:39:12 EDT)
  • ID vs.? (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 13:34:19 EDT)
  • Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection. (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 12:45:18 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 17:23:09 EDT)
  • Dembski 1/2 (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 15:02:33 EDT)
  • ID vs. ? (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 12:17:26 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 13:50:42 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 15:32:01 EDT)
  • U of Cal embarrassed by loony professor on Nightline (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 18:59:34 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 15:00:38 EDT)
  • A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 12:35:47 EDT)
  • A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:11:16 EDT)
  • A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 12:35:24 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 11:39:43 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 13:58:30 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 11:02:30 EDT)
  • Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 16:08:16 EDT)
  • A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 14:20:06 EDT)
  • A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 13:49:28 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 13:45:20 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:50:24 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:37:56 EDT)
  • What is a Darwinist? (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 12:04:25 EDT)
  • What is a "Darwinist'? (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 20:41:45 EDT)
  • More about teaching the controversy (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 10:51:45 EDT)
  • More about teaching the controversy (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 09:29:55 EDT)
  • What is a "Darwinist"? (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 08:25:16 EDT)
  • More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 20:49:20 EDT)
  • More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 16:56:15 EDT)
  • More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 12:01:41 EDT)
  • More about teaching the controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 17:49:59 EDT)
  • Teaching the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 12:20:22 EDT)
  • Teach the controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:05:52 EDT)
  • Teach the Controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 19:41:08 EDT)
  • A question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 14:05:09 EDT)
  • Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 13:54:49 EDT)
  • Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 12:52:11 EDT)
  • Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 16:29:50 EDT)
  • Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 12:17:49 EDT)
• Bill Payne
  • Re: Scopes in Reverse (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 09:47:00 EDT)
• billwald@juno.com
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 16:45:46 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 13:02:58 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 14:05:53 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 13:14:00 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 13:01:09 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 23:48:37 EDT)
  • what is life, anyway? (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 00:21:41 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:38:10 EDT)
  • Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 20:52:08 EDT)
  • Re: Just a Theory (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 20:35:07 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 21:36:43 EDT)
  • Re: Just a Theory (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 21:41:13 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 13:12:33 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:29:28 EDT)
  • Re: Is anybody out there? (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:18:22 EDT)
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 19:24:14 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 19:15:37 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 21:35:03 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:44:15 EDT)
  • another interview with Phil Johnson (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 00:15:45 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 22:11:21 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 20:11:31 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 17:58:43 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 00:14:34 EDT)
  • Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 00:17:30 EDT)
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 13:19:20 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 23:55:25 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 13:28:04 EDT)
  • Evidence against ID? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 00:30:44 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 02:15:20 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 01:42:39 EDT)
  • Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection. (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 11:45:15 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 01:53:32 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (was the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? ...) (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 01:53:05 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 02:28:44 EDT)
  • Why evolution is not truly random (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 17:26:16 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 02:53:06 EDT)
  • Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 02:35:27 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 01:35:54 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 01:35:13 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 09:19:32 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 14:04:51 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 09:02:04 EDT)
  • Macro, Shmacro (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 01:51:02 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 02:05:14 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 08:36:41 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:15:01 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 03:04:19 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in Reverse (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:11:12 EDT)
  • Re: Just a Theory (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 00:28:08 EDT)
  • Macroevolution vs. ID theory (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 20:01:19 EDT)
  • Re: Fw: Re: Designed Designers? (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 23:56:45 EDT)
• Cliff Hamrick
  • RE: ID vs.? (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 11:00:05 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 06:30:04 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 05:41:03 EDT)
• Cliff Lundberg
  • Re: ID vs ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 01:22:31 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 23:54:35 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 12:49:43 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 03:17:50 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 13:24:12 EDT)
  • Re: Dembski 1/2 (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 17:36:38 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 16:40:12 EDT)
  • Re: quote is wildly out of context? (was A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2) (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 23:50:33 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2 (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 21:52:22 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 14:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 01:49:59 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 13:22:10 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 13:18:00 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 00:00:23 EDT)
  • Re: random genetic drift vs natural selection (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 05:13:58 EDT)
• Craig De Lisle
  • ADV - ATHLETIC DIRECTOR (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 09:39:46 EDT)
• David Bradbury
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 15:37:03 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 15:11:07 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 19:48:38 EDT)
• David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu
  • Re: Teaching the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 14:13:03 EDT)
• FMAJ1019@aol.com
  • Re: ID vs.? (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:09:59 EDT)
  • Evolution of biological information (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:07:20 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:06:01 EDT)
• Huxter4441@aol.com
  • Re: U of Cal embarrassed by loony professor on Nightline (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 10:45:57 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from ... (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 15:49:07 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 18:09:18 EDT)
  • Re: What is a "Darwinist'? (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 16:57:57 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 09:34:47 EDT)
  • Re: What is a "Darwinist"? (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 17:29:57 EDT)
  • Hey Bertvan - Whats a 'Darwinist'? (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 23:04:06 EDT)
• Larry Chefalo
  • auth 3ef8b22a subscribe evolution slccfrontliner@hotmail.com (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 12:40:56 EDT)
• mytvtaxi.com
  • ADV: mytvtaxi.com - Everything TV! (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 19:22:35 EDT)
• pearson@panam1.panam.edu
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:25:20 EDT)
• Richard Wein
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 18:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 05:28:49 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 19:31:02 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 16:14:58 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 12:23:08 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 08:57:20 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 10:19:34 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 05:00:41 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 04:40:27 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 05:48:02 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 05:00:13 EDT)
  • Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 05:37:54 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 20:05:30 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 11:40:50 EDT)
  • Re: Kansas standards: religious values = myths? (was Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs) (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 10:10:40 EDT)
  • Re: Macro, Shmacro (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 10:08:37 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:49:42 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 10:22:58 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 05:20:54 EDT)
  • Re: Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 06:14:34 EDT)
  • Another ID argument (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 13:59:14 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 08:26:19 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 09:01:32 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 08:19:53 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 07:20:26 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 10:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 18:42:57 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:31:19 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 10:01:41 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 06:04:24 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 09:07:42 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 17:16:37 EDT)
• Stephen E. Jones
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:06:34 EDT)
  • RE: ID vs. ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 18:20:50 EDT)
  • Re: Darwin wars (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 17:55:44 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 16:29:06 EDT)
  • Re: quote is wildly out of context? (was A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2) (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 20:30:56 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (was the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? ...) (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 18:09:56 EDT)
  • Re: A Pyrrhic Victory For Kansas (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 19:00:34 EDT)
  • Re: Study Shows Out-Of-Africa Migration to Israel (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 17:44:35 EDT)
  • Re: Macro, Shmacro (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 19:07:08 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 18:32:24 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 18:18:17 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2 (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 16:54:54 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 2/2 (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 10:35:24 EDT)
  • Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 05:47:49 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:42:34 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 18:20:16 EDT)
  • Re: Kansas standards: religious values = myths? (was Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs) (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 18:19:47 EDT)
  • Re: Johnson's complacency (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 18:23:18 EDT)
  • Re: Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 17:48:12 EDT)
  • Re: What is a "Darwinist'? (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 07:48:54 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 17:48:51 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 02:12:32 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:27:43 EDT)
  • Re: The Wedge of Truth-Amazon.com customer reviews (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:14:50 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 17:52:02 EDT)
  • Re: anti-evolutionists booted out (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 05:04:18 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 03:43:03 EDT)
  • Re: random genetic drift vs natural selection (was Scopes in reverse) (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 20:40:59 EDT)
  • Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 09:16:36 EDT)
  • Re: anti-evolutionists booted out (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 19:36:51 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 10:26:47 EDT)
  • RE: Behe responds to critics! (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 18:38:23 EDT)
  • Re: Is anybody out there? (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 17:56:56 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Tue Aug 01 2000 - 17:56:15 EDT)
  • Re: Nightline (Tue Aug 01 2000 - 17:53:45 EDT)
• Steven P Crawford
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 09:47:25 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 23:15:25 EDT)
  • A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 09:54:54 EDT)
  • Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 23:17:07 EDT)
  • Fw: Fw: Re: Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 15:07:46 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 15:57:57 EDT)
  • Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 15:04:14 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 09:21:37 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 22:49:33 EDT)
  • Re: Designed Designers? (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 00:46:10 EDT)
  • Re: Fw: Re: Designed Designers? (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 10:50:40 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: Designed Designers? (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:01:09 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: Designed Designers? (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:02:02 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: Van Till's chapter (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:00:40 EDT)
  • Fw: Re: Designed Designers? (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:01:37 EDT)
• Susan Brassfield
  • Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 22:23:29 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 12:41:35 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 10:40:36 EDT)
  • A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 18:24:25 EDT)
  • Re: anti-evolutionists booted out (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 21:22:21 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:13:27 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:11:18 EDT)
  • Re: Just a Theory (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 08:43:03 EDT)
  • Re: anti-evolutionists booted out (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 20:38:38 EDT)
• Susan Brassfield Cogan
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 12:59:14 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs.? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 12:53:43 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 09:20:19 EDT)
  • Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 15:20:51 EDT)
  • Re: Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection. (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 15:20:54 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs. ? (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 12:57:34 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2 (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 15:15:40 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:28:10 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 15:29:32 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 12:50:06 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:24:09 EDT)
  • Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:15:53 EDT)
  • Re: What is a "Darwinist'? (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 12:53:00 EDT)
  • Re: Another ID argument (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:49:05 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:44:54 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 17:50:13 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 10:57:05 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:29:45 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 15:19:06 EDT)
  • Re: Teaching the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 15:11:42 EDT)
  • Re: Teaching the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 12:49:44 EDT)
  • Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 17:35:07 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 15:08:15 EDT)
  • Just a Theory (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 13:30:20 EDT)
  • Re: Scopes in reverse (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 09:54:01 EDT)
  • anti-evolutionists booted out (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 17:05:14 EDT)
• Tedd Hadley
  • Re: ID vs ? (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 12:54:45 EDT)
  • Re: ID vs ? (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 17:22:18 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 13:07:07 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 12:58:38 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 15:09:26 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:55:10 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 13:44:04 EDT)
  • Re: More about teaching the controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 19:39:56 EDT)
  • Re: Teaching the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:05:32 EDT)
  • Re: Teach the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 12:08:04 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 12:33:44 EDT)
  • Re: A Question of Abiogenesis (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 17:25:54 EDT)
• Terry Trainor
  • RE: Teach the controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 04:03:30 EDT)
  • Re: Just a Theory (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 08:34:48 EDT)
  • Re: Just a Theory (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 08:26:05 EDT)
• Wesley R. Elsberry
  • More fiction from Stephen (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:17:35 EDT)
  • Interesting paper (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 12:18:47 EDT)
  • Johnson's complacency (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 11:33:53 EDT)
  • Teach the Controversy (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 01:05:56 EDT)
  • Teach the Controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:32:15 EDT)
  • Teach the Controversy (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:41:28 EDT)

Last message date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:35 EDT
Archived on: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:40 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:40 EDT