RE: Behe responds to critics!

From: Stephen E. Jones (sejones@iinet.net.au)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2000 - 18:38:23 EDT

  • Next message: billwald@juno.com: "Re: Is anybody out there?"

    Reflectorites

    Mike Behe's responses to various criticisms of his Irreducible Complexity
    theory have been posted on the Discovery Institute website.

    Here are the titles:

    http://www.discovery.org/embeddedRecentArticles.php3?id=441
            "A True Acid Test":
            Response to Ken Miller

    http://www.discovery.org/crsc/CRSCrecentArticles.php3?id=446
            A Mousetrap Defended:
            Response to Critics
     
    http://www.discovery.org/embeddedRecentArticles.php3?id=442
            In Defense of the Irreducibility of the Blood Clotting
            Cascade: Response to Russell Doolittle, Ken Miller and Keith
            Robison
     
    http://www.discovery.org/embeddedRecentArticles.php3?id=443
            Irreducible Complexity and the Evolutionary Literature:
            Response to Critics

    http://www.discovery.org/embeddedRecentArticles.php3?id=445
            Philosophical Objections to Intelligent Design:
            Response to Critics

    I haven't had time to read them all properly, and therefore comment on
    them, but maybe someone would like to offer comments and/or criticisms
    so we can discuss them?

    Steve

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "But many biologists, looking at evolution over longer time intervals, have
    noted that species are rarely modified consistently in one direction long
    enough for significant evolutionary change to accumulate. Even the
    Galapagos finches seem to oscillate, not really "going any where" in an
    evolutionary sense. The reason is that short-term environmental change
    tends to be cyclical, so natural selection is not likely to keep pushing a
    species in any one particular direction long enough for new species or
    major new adaptations to evolve. Furthermore, every species is broken up
    into local populations, each of which belongs to a different local
    ecosystem-making it even less likely that natural selection will modify the
    entire species in any particular way as time rolls on." (Eldredge N.,
    "Evolution and Environment: The two faces of biodiversity," Natural
    History, June 1998, pp.54-55)
    Stephen E. Jones | sejones@iinet.net.au | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 18:36:44 EDT