From: Susan Brassfield Cogan <Susan-Brassfield@ou.edu>
Bertvan:
>>Cliff:
>>> They will also use it to justify the
>>>way that they aim their arguments at the public and politicians,
bypassing
>>>the scientific community--another sign of the propagandist nature of
their
>>>campaign. In doing so, they will ignore the possibility that the paper
was
>>>rejected simply because it lacked scientific merit.
>>
>
>Bertvan:
>>I agree. The journal can hardly be accused of intolerance when they
>promosed
>>to consider a paper on ID within another 1000 years--if it has merit.
>
>Cliff should consider a lucrative job with the Psychic Hotline. You just
>did exactly what he said ID proponents would do.
This was a misattribution by Bertvan. She was quoting *me*, not Cliff. As
for a job with Psychic Hotline... I've submitted a telepathic application
and I'm waiting for them to get back to me.
By the way, I should clarify that I cc'ed my earlier post to Cliff Hamrick,
who presumably "replied to all", so his reply came to the Reflector. I don't
think he is a subscriber to the Reflector.
Richard Wein (Tich)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:58:30 EDT