Stephen E. Jones wrote:
>>However, if evolution of a "complex organ" like the eye was not by
>>"numerous, successive, slight modifications", then one would have to
>>advocate the equivalent of a genetic miracle!
Cliff:
>Well, a miracle is exactly what you believe in, why should you care
>whether it's genetic or something else? Does ID demand action through
>non-natural mechanisms? You can call anything a miracle
Bertvan:
I don't think ID either demands or denies action through non-natural
mechanisms. Do you consider "intelligence" either miraculous or non-natural?
(Just asking. Honest!!)
Bertvan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 26 2000 - 15:02:51 EDT