Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen)

From: Stephen E. Jones (sejones@iinet.net.au)
Date: Tue Aug 22 2000 - 18:32:24 EDT

  • Next message: Brian D Harper: "Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc."

    Reflectorites

    On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:35:54 -0500, Chris Cogan wrote:

    [...]

    CC>... Johnson and his gang of intellectual thugs ....
    >we have almost pure trash like "Darwin on Trial," ...
    >... I know how unreliable Stephen is at quoting, ...
    >Johnson has not given up his campaign of lies and misrepresentations.
    >... A sick desire to prove himself "right" to his following of the
    >intellectually under-achievers. ...
    >2. ... which, like most
    >forms of Christianity, is always willing to sacrifice things like the truth
    >...Johnson exposes essentially his entire fraud ...
    >...He never had any scientific evidence to *begin* with.

    [...]

    Thanks to Chris for his message warmly supporting my argument about
    "the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'". I encourage him
    to keep up the good work! :-)

    [...]

    On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:49:07 EDT, Huxter4441@aol.com wrote:

    [...]

    HX>Hmmmm..... KBoE comes to mind... Oh - and then there is the recent
    >'presentation' to an education sub-committee by the master propagandist
    >Johnson and cohorts - with no opposing viewpoints offered, of course....

    What sort of point is this? It was a briefing with the express purpose of
    explaining ID to Congressmen. If Darwinists want to hold their own briefing
    they can.

    Steve

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "It is still to be demonstrated how these essential molecules, such as
    haemoglobin, chlorophyll and other proteins and nucleic acids were
    formed. But even if we were to allow a primeval soup to have existed for
    the full history of the Earth (4,000-4,500 million years), complex proteins
    and nucleic-acid molecules could never have been produced by random,
    chance interactions. However, here are you and I on Earth today. And the
    evidence of the fossil record shows that some sequence o events of almost
    zero probability did take place over 3,500 million years ago. Before the
    event, the chances that it would occur were exceedingly small. What is
    more, from out understanding of the possible processes leading to the
    origin of life and the critical part played by living organisms in the
    development processes, the transition from non-living to living matter
    probably occurred only once and could have occurred only once. The
    origin of life was an almost utterly improbable event with almost impossible
    odds against a chance happening But life did originate. So was it by
    chance? Or was it by design and control?" (Brooks J., "Origins of Life,"
    Lion: Tring, Hertfordshire UK, 1985, p.87)
    Stephen E. Jones | sejones@iinet.net.au | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 22 2000 - 18:39:21 EDT