In a message dated 8/28/2000 10:35:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Bertvan@aol.com writes:
<< Bertvan
Hi Cliff H,
My question was what is the belief that opposes ID. From your reply I assume
it is that life arose through purely naturalistic means. I am not "opposed"
to such a theory. I just don't believe it. Are you willing to put everyone
>>
Perhaps for good reasons but perhaps not. So far naturalistic means have been
quite succesful in explaining our world and no evidence of ID in biology
exists.
w<< ho is skeptical of abiogenesis in the ID camp? We would be delighted.
In
any case, I encourage anyone who believes life arose naturalistically to
pursue it vigorously. I question anyone's right to declare abiogenesis a
fact until it has been demonstrated. (I haven't heard any ID advocates
seriously pushing space aliens. That's mainly done by ID critics looking for
a straw man.)
>>
ID is more than abiogenesis. According to Behe, ID is that which creates IC
structures although non IC structures can arise naturally. I wonder how he
envisions the designer to act?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:10:10 EDT