Re: Is anybody out there?

From: Stephen E. Jones (sejones@iinet.net.au)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2000 - 17:56:56 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen E. Jones: "RE: Behe responds to critics!"

    Reflectorites

    Here are excerpts from web articles for the period 19 - 28 July 2000, with
    my comments in square brackets.

    Steve

    ==========================================================================
    http://www.cnn.com/2000/books/reviews/07/28/review.rareearth/index.html
    CNN ... Review: Is anybody out there? July 28, 2000 ... "Rare Earth: Why
    Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe" By Peter D. Ward and David
    Brownlee ... (CNN) -- The notion that life existed anywhere in the universe
    besides Earth was once laughable in the scientific community. Over the
    past thirty years or so, the laughter has died away. As the vast scale of the
    Universe has become clearer, the notion that life could have arisen only on
    Earth seems increasingly unlikely. The law of averages alone would
    suggest that there must be many places in the cosmos that harbor life. ....
    "Not so fast," say Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee. The two ... argue
    that the recent trend in scientific thought has gone too far. They suggest
    that even if the universe is teeming with life, complex organisms are not
    likely to appear on many - - if any -- planets besides our own. They make
    their case in "Rare Earth." The authors draw on a wide variety of scientific
    disciplines, from geology to paleontology to astrophysics, as they lay out
    the evidence that Earth may be a singular habitat for animal life. ... Ward
    and Brownlee acknowledge that life arose fairly quickly on Earth, and they
    allow that simple life forms, of the single-cell variety, might be common on
    many other planets. But they insist that the evolution that led to everything
    from butterflies to redwoods to humans is the result of a peculiar, and
    perhaps unique, sequence of events on Earth. There is a long list of
    interrelated factors leading them to this conclusion. They include the
    presence of the planet Jupiter in an orbit sufficiently far away from Earth to
    deflect much of the cosmic debris floating around the solar system. If
    Jupiter weren't there, or if it were in a different orbit, a lot of that junk
    would be crashing into Earth and extinguishing complex plant and animal
    life. Only Earth, among the inner planets of the Solar System, has plate
    tectonics, a process that serves as a sort of regulator on our global
    temperature, as well as providing enough dry land for complex organisms
    to inhabit. They also cite the happy accident of Earth's position in the
    galaxy -- not too close to the intense radiation of the central core, not so
    far away that it's left without the chemical building blocks of life. And
    there's the position of the galaxy itself -- not in a globular cluster, not in a
    metal-poor quadrant, but in just the right spot to foster the rise of complex
    life. ... "The continued marginalization of Earth and its place in the
    Universe perhaps should be reassessed," .... "We are not the center of the
    Universe ... But we are not so ordinary as Western science has made us out
    to be for two millennia. Our global inferiority complex may be
    unwarranted." [For most of the last "two millennia" Christianity taught that
    we were special, until science thought it knew better. Another example of
    how science has had to come back to the Christian position. But as Kuhn
    points out, the way science works by eradicating history they can never
    admit it!]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000801/sc/space_aliens_dc_1.html
    Yahoo! ... August 1 ... Huge New Telescope to Boost Hunt for Alien Life
    ... SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - With millions of dollars in funding
    pledged by two of the men behind software giant Microsoft, the search for
    intelligent life on other planets got a big boost ... as officials unveiled plans
    for a massive new telescope to scan the skies. The Allen Telescope Array -
    - named for Microsoft Corp. co-founder Paul Allen, who put up $11.5
    million for the project -- will be "the world's most powerful instrument
    designed to seek out signals from civilizations elsewhere in our galaxy," the
    SETI ... Institute said. Joining Allen in funding the project was former
    Microsoft Chief Technology Officer Nathan Myhrvold, who contributed $1
    million toward the total of $26 million needed to build the field of hundreds
    of linked radio telescope dishes in northern California. "While the best
    scientific estimates tell us the probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the
    universe is fairly high, there is great uncertainty and some controversy in
    the calculation," ...SETI Institute ... researchers have never before had their
    own installation devoted exclusively to hunting down signals from alien
    worlds. ... which has been going on for more than four decades. While
    researchers have carefully screened records of extraterrestrial radio
    emissions, they have yet to come up with a signal displaying a pattern that
    could clearly indicate it was produced by intelligent life. ... Unlike
    mammoth dishes .... the Allen Array will be constructed from between 500
    to 1,000 small, mass-produced dishes resembling those used for home
    satellite television reception. ... but their signals will be electronically linked
    to form one picture ..." ... astronomers were ... focusing on those suns
    which most resemble our own Solar system and are closest to us as the best
    possible chance for discovering nearby intelligent life. The new telescope
    will incorporate ... large amounts of affordable computer processing, which
    will enable it to look at up to a dozen candidate star systems
    simultaneously, ... the full telescope [is[ scheduled to become operational in
    2005. ... [Myhrvold's "the best scientific estimates tell us the probability of
    intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is fairly high" conflicts with more
    recent thinking like Ward & Brownlee's. A lot of small dishes might be easy
    to hoax?]

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/07/28/blind.cavefish.reut/index.html
    CNN ... Blind fish show eyes can grow back July 28, 2000 ....
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Researchers said ... they had caused eyes to
    grow in fish that have been blind for aeons -- simply by inserting a lens
    from sighted fish. They said the lens seemed to send out signals that
    instructed the eyes in the blind cavefish to grow -- a finding that sheds light
    on how eyes evolve and develop. A fish known as Astyanax mexicanus
    lives deep inside caves off the coast of Mexico where there is no light.
    Millions of years ago it had eyes but soon after it starts growing in the egg,
    the eyes start to degenerate and the fish are born blind. Fish of the same
    species that live on the surface, where there is light, grow eyes and see
    normally ... They implanted a lens from the eye of a surface-dwelling fish
    into a cave-fish cousin and then watched to see what would happen. Within
    eight days, an eye started developing from underneath a flap of skin ....
    After two months the cave fish had grown a large eye with a distinct pupil,
    cornea and iris, they said. The retina of the eye had photoreceptor cells
    known as rods. Yamamoto said he was not sure what the lens did to
    stimulate development of the eye. "Maybe some growth factor but we are
    not sure what kind of growth factor," ... the lenses of eyes were known to
    secrete a variety of growth factors, which ... stimulate cell growth and
    development. "This offers clues about what sort of molecules are involved
    in eye growth of any vertebrate and it shows the growth of an eye is
    controlled in a large part by the lens" ... [See also
    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000727/sc/cavefish_eyes_dc_1.html. If
    this holds up it will shows that the eye simulation by Nilsson & Pelger
    (1994) was bogus, since they thought that light alone acting on layers of
    cells would do it. It is a good illustration of how Darwinian just-so stories
    can be seductive delusions. Just because one can reverse-engineer
    something, break it down into small steps and then re-run it forward on a
    computer to arrive back where one started, is no evidence that is how it got
    there in nature in the first place. That is confusing logical with *biological*.
    The best refutation of Nilsson & Pelger's simulation was unintended - see
    my tagline.]

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/07/25/bc.life.monument.reut/index.html
    CNN ... US judge blocks Ten Commandments monument July 25, 2000 ...
    FRANKFORT, Kentucky (Reuters) -- A federal judge Tuesday told the
    state of Kentucky it may not install a monument of the Ten
    Commandments on the grounds ... Judge Joseph Hood ... said the nine-foot
    monument would give the impression that the state has "expressed favor"
    for the ancient rules, which are a cornerstone of both the Christian and
    Jewish faiths, in violation of the Constitution's guarantee of church-state
    separation. The monument ... stood on the capitol grounds until 1980 when
    it was moved to make way for a new building. ... The Kentucky Legislature
    earlier this year passed a resolution requiring the monument to be brought
    out of storage and reinstalled ... The American Civil Liberties Union sued
    the state to prevent the monument from being brought back ... [The Ten
    Commandment are common to Jews, Christian and Moslems, and I doubt
    that other religions would object to them. And I suspect the overwhelming
    majority of the public would have no objection to them either. So whose
    "civil liberties" is the ACLU *really* protecting? It is one thing not to have
    a State established church as in Europe, which is obviously what the
    Founding Fathers were trying to prevent. But it is quite another to
    completely banish from public life any trace of religion. The re-erecting of a
    monument of the Ten Commandments is hardly "Congress" making "a law
    respecting an establishment of religion" Haven't these judges any common
    sense? Or is their real motivation the imposition of their own private
    minority atheistic/agnostic beliefs on the majority?]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000726/sc/birds_dc_1.html Yahoo! ...
    July 26 ... Size of Bird Genome Linked to Longevity LONDON (Reuters)
    The secret to a long life, in birds at least, is in the size of their genome ...
    Birds live much longer than mammals and birds of the same size have very
    different sized genomes. Researchers at Glasgow University have
    discovered that birds with the biggest genomes, the amount of DNA in
    their cells, tend to live the longest. "Across the animal kingdom there is a
    huge variation in the amount of DNA different organisms have. People
    have long been interested in trying to see if they can link that to any feature
    in the organism," ... "Even though birds tend to have relatively small
    amounts of DNA, the birds which have a lot for their body size live a long
    time, so birds with the biggest genomes live the longest," ... "We were
    surprised that there was such a good relationship with lifespan, or potential
    longevity," she said, though it was not possible to tell if the finding holds
    true for other animals. ... [Since it is likely that most, if not all, this extra
    DNA is non-coding so-called `junk' DNA, this would be another example
    of how it is not `junk'. Perhaps if non-coding DNA gives protection against
    mutations, helps the immune system, and increases cell surface area, then
    this could manifest itself in longer life.]

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/space/07/19/space.survey.ap/index.html
    CNN ... Study: Women less inclined to support space exploration July 19,
    2000 ... LOUDONVILLE, New York (AP) -- Men may be from Mars, but
    a new study says women are, well, earthbound -- at least when it comes to
    supporting space research and exploration. Surveyors for the Siena College
    Research Institute in New York asked hundreds of state residents if they
    feel the United States spends too much on space research. Forty-four
    percent of the women surveyed said yes, as opposed to 29 percent of the
    men. And while 50 percent of the men said they supported attempts to send
    people to Mars, just 27 percent of the women did. ... [I wonder if this anti-
    space exploration attitude of women carries over into the
    creation/evolution area. Are there any polls which show if more women are
    sceptical of evolution than men. I was reading something the other day
    which pointed out that Darwin, Freud and Einstein* failed to convince their
    own wives of their theories! * in Einstein's case this was his second wife.
    There are some who claim that Einstein's physicist first wife Mileva Maric
    actually *discovered* his theory!]

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/07/27/ocean.methane.ap/index.html
    CNN ... Mass extinction traced to oceanic methane burp July 27, 2000 ...
    (AP) -- Huge reservoirs of methane trapped beneath the ocean floor rapidly
    escaped during prehistoric global warming and depleted much of the sea's
    oxygen, according to new research into why many forms of life suddenly
    vanished 183 million years ago. The findings ... shed new light not only on
    the disappearance of as many as 80 percent of some deep-sea species but
    also a process suspected in other prehistoric mass extinctions. ... The study
    also raised questions about today's sea floor reservoir of methane hydrate,
    which the federal government plans to study as a possible energy source.
    "One of the important questions that is debated a lot today is the stability
    of this methane hydrate reservoir ... Methane hydrate is formed beneath the
    sea floor when algae from the surface dies and sinks. Normally a gas, the
    methane is locked in an ice- like state but is susceptible to changes in
    pressure and temperature. ... The researchers believe massive volcanic
    eruptions during the Jurassic period initiated global warming by spewing
    carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. ... "A
    number of important fossil groups disappeared at exactly that time," ...
    Hardest hit were bottom-feeding clam-like organisms known as bivalves:
    An estimated 80 percent of the species disappeared. ... the event took place
    over a period of 5,000 years - - a blink in geologic time. ... "It's not
    necessarily that they've found the absolute smoking gun, but they're
    probably on the right track." ... [Another cause of extinction. But I saw
    somewhere that the K/T extinction was partly caused by the asteroid
    igniting the methane hydrate? Bit of a worry if this present global warming
    heats this up.]

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/americas/07/27/brazil.dinosaur.ap/index.html
    CNN ... Brazilian scientists unveil reconstruction of Tyrannosaurus
    ancestor July 27, 2000 ... RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil (AP) - Scientists on
    Thursday unveiled the reconstructed skeleton of a sheep dog-sized
    dinosaur they said was an ancestor of the Tyrannosaurus rex. ... the
    discovery was important, both because of how well it was preserved and
    the clues it provided about the origins of Tyrannosaurus rex. "The material
    is perfect, it's as if it was buried yesterday," ... Because the Santanaraptor
    lived right at the time when the South American continent was separating
    from Africa, Kellner believes the discovery proves the Tyrannosaurus rex's
    roots lie in the Southern Hemisphere. Even though his team only managed
    to uncover the dinosaur's two legs and parts of the hips and tail, they were
    able to reconstruct the whole body by looking at dinosaurs with similar
    bone structures at around the same stage of evolution and extrapolate. ...
    [Sounds a bit "iffy", reconstructing a whole dinosaur from legs, hips and
    tail, and then claiming that even though dog-size it was T-Rex's ancestor.
    The ICR should like the bit about it looking "as if it was buried
    yesterday"!]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000726/sc/health_liver_dc_2.html
    Yahoo! ... July 26 ... Study: Parasite Makes Rats More Vulnerable to Cats
    .... LONDON (Reuters) - A parasite found in mammals causes behavioral
    changes in rats that makes them more vulnerable to cats, scientists said ...
    Rats normally have an innate aversion to their feline foes but British
    researchers at the University of Oxford have discovered that a parasite
    called Toxoplasma gondii makes rats less fearful and an easier prey for
    cats. The parasite lives in the intestines of cats and is excreted with feces.
    In infected rats, it alters their behavior toward cats, which eat them,
    completing the parasite's lifecycle. "Parasites are amazing things, if they can
    manipulate behavior to increase their chance of completing their life cycle
    they will," Professor Joanne Webster .. said ... "Toxoplasma gondii is an
    ideal parasite to do this. It has a two-stage lifecycle, with rats as the
    intermediate host. "There is a whole suite of behaviors it seems to change,
    all of which makes them more likely to be preyed on by the cats, the
    definitive host," .... The findings ... are particularly interesting because
    many humans, including 22 percent of Britons, are infected with the
    parasite. ... ... "We shouldn't be ignoring such a prevalent parasite in our
    brains. Indeed there is evidence that we can expect subtle behavioral
    differences in humans too," ... [If this holds up it might be an example of
    how natural `selection' can do *something*? Maybe it will replace the
    Peppered Moth? :-)
    ==========================================================================

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "An increasingly fruitful approach in evolutionary biology involves
    modeling selection mathematically and then allowing the computer to
    compress millions of generations into a few minutes of digital activity. Such
    electronic experiments can determine whether or not a model is plausible
    and provide a rough idea of the time required for particular changes to
    occur. Dan Nilsson and Susanne Pelger took this approach in an attempt to
    see whether camera eyes can evolve from a patch of light-sensitive cells. ...
    Thus, by a series of exceedingly tiny selective events, each required to
    increase the fitness of the individual involved and constrained to operate on
    a very small level of morphological variation, the essentials of the most
    advanced optical system in nature appear spontaneously in fewer than 2000
    generations - 2000-20,000 years for a typical vertebrate species. So rapid is
    this process when modeled that the perennial question of how eyes could
    evolve must now be replaced with an equally puzzling problem: how could
    eyes have taken so long to evolve?" (Gould J.L., Keeton W.T. & Gould C.G.,
    "Biological Science," [1967], W.W. Norton & Co: New York NY, Sixth Edition,
    1996, Vol. 1, p.463).
    Stephen E. Jones | sejones@iinet.net.au | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 17:57:46 EDT