evolution@calvin.edu by thread
Starting: Wed 01 Nov 1995 - 11:56:23 EST
Ending: Sun 31 Dec 1995 - 23:26:50 EST
Messages: 781
- Re: Signing off Kevin Wirth
- farewell Dave Probert
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Terry M. Gray
- Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Bill Hamilton
- Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Bill Hamilton
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Too much of a false thing GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- New listserv software Terry M. Gray
- Re: Broca's Area and the man with no brain GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Stephen Jones
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Pamphlet Part V John W. Burgeson
- Pamphlet Part V John W. Burgeson
- Test. Kyle VanderBeek
- Test. Kyle VanderBeek
- Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part V vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part IV vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part II response 3 vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: ICR Home Page (was Pamphlet part I) Stephen Jones
- Re: Phil Johnson's debating style (was ICR) Stephen Jones
- week 4 John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Week 5 John W. Burgeson
- Week 8 John W. Burgeson
- Week 6 John W. Burgeson
- Week 7 John W. Burgeson
- Week 9 John W. Burgeson
- Re: Whipping Glenn ;-) Dave Probert
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- diagram Glenn.Morton@ORYX.COM
- Re: Gish vs Ross #2 (was ICR) Stephen Jones
- Re: Gish vs Ross #1 (was ICR) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- oafishness A.E. Manier Sr.
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: EC v PC 1/2 (was It's the early bird that fits the bil Stephen Jones
- Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Stephen Jones
- Re: EC v PC 2/2 (was It's the early bird that fits the bil Stephen Jones
- Re: free will/determinism and God's planning GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Cold Air From the North GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Cold Air From the North GRMorton@aol.com
- muddleheadedness quotient Steve Clark
- Re: Re:free will/determinism and God's planning Dave Probert
- Re:free will/determinism and God's planning GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Merry Christmas folks Bill Hamilton
- Design, evolution and imperfection arguments Bill Hamilton
- money, other abstractions => humans <> animals Bill Hamilton
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Survey II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Survey vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Seismosaurus John W. Burgeson
- Re: Happy Christmas Stephen Jones
- Re: PC and Biblical Theologians (was Time/Cambrian Explosi Stephen Jones
- Pamphlet Part III response 2 vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Jim Foley
- Molecular Adam and Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part III, 1st response vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Humans > Other ? John W. Burgeson
- Week 3 John W. Burgeson
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
- pamphlet Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- science and the supernatural Dave Probert
- Pamphlet Part I Iteration 2 vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Molecular Adam and Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
- Week 2 John W. Burgeson
- Re: eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Denis Lamoureux
- Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) GRMorton@aol.com
- The Scientist as Map-maker John W. Burgeson
- Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Refutation? vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Thomas L Moore
- Focus on the Family Gish/Ross debate Bill Hamilton
- Week 1 of Phil Johnson's tour John W. Burgeson
- Focus on the Family Gish-Ross discussion Bill Hamilton
- How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
- Genetic Similarity Dennis L. Durst
- Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dennis L. Durst
- Re: ICR John W. Burgeson
- "evolution" antithetical? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
- Alta Vista Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: ICR Bill Hamilton
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Josh 10 Denis Lamoureux
- Self-Organization [was Re: It's the early bird ... Brian D. Harper
- Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: ICR Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosi Stephen Jones
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Stephen Jones
- Re: Creatio ex nihilo Dave Probert
- Animal ancestry of Adam's body Terry M. Gray
- Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: flood models #1 Stephen Jones
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Brian D. Harper
- Time Off vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Reply to Ratzsch II GRMorton@aol.com
- Reply to Ratzsch GRMorton@aol.com
- Old art GRMorton@aol.com
- Reply to Ratzsch II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Conspiracy Theory (was Time/Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
- Re: Creatio ex nihilo Dave Probert
- Reply to Ratzsch vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Cc: to groups Terry M. Gray
- Cc: to groups Terry M. Gray
- Re: Pamphlet part I Jim Foley
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) David J. Tyler
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
- Comments on Phil Johnson seminar John W. Burgeson
- reply to Burgy John W. Burgeson
- Pamphlet part I vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Pamphlet Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Annotation to Outline vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Brian D. Harper
- Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Re: ICR Bill Hamilton
- reply to Burgy SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Brian D. Harper
- Re: Robert Gentry Bill Hamilton
- Re: ICR Bill Hamilton
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Stephen Jones
- De Novo Adam Jim Bell
- Longgupo Habilis GRMorton@aol.com
- Subject: Re: Chordates, Evolution and the flood GRMorton@aol.com
- Musings and Retractions vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: flood models #1 GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: human explosion GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: flood models #1 GRMorton@aol.com
- Fwd: Chordates, Evolution and the flood GRMorton@aol.com
- The Cambrian Explosion GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Two Adam Model GRMorton@aol.com
- Response to Weekend Posts GRMorton@aol.com
- Time/Cambrian Explosion Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- human remains jimbeh@ms.uky.edu
- Time/Cambrian Explosion Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Human Evolution Part 4 (?) vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Mail problems Terry M. Gray
- Terry Gray vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Time/Cambrian Explosion part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Time/Cambrian Explosion vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Cut off in mid-thread GRMorton@aol.com
- Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) Brian D. Harper
- The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
- Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Jim Foley
- Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
- Re: Being A Good Christian :-) Denis Lamoureux
- Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Foley
- Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
- Re: Response to Weekend Posts Jim Foley
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Talking apes? That's a laugh, say scientists Gordon Simons
- A couple questions for Walter John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- New creation (was Re: A Question for TE's (fwd)) Bill Hamilton
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
- Re: Creatio ex nihilo Denis Lamoureux
- Creatio ex nihilo Russ Maatman
- Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Walter ReMine
- Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Re: The "two-Adam model" Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Technical Difficulties vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Response to Weekend Posts vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
- Post From Glenn M. Denis Lamoureux
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
- De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
- De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
- De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
- bounced again GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Denis Lamoureux
- Re: De Novo Adam (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: second law Denis Lamoureux
- Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
- De Novo Adam Jim Bell
- The Night Before Christmas John W. Burgeson
- Re: Broca's region & speech, and Chinese GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
- psychic phenomena Dave Probert
- Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Foley
- Broca's region & speech Jim Bell
- Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
- 2-adam, need Hebrew help. GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Dave Probert
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Gentry Po halo work Bill Hamilton
- Re: A question for TE's Denis Lamoureux
- Human Evolution Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Human Evolution Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- The Night Before Christmas Steven Fawl
- Human Evolution Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Human Evolution Part II Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Human Evolution Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) John P Turnbull
- Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Steve Clark
- Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
- Re: Testing Darwinism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Human Evolution vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Dave Probert
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Probability, Statistics and Theology Bill Hamilton
- Science and supernatural causation (and schools) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Denis Lamoureux
- archive address Terry M. Gray
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: The "two-Adam model" GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
- HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA!!! vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Re: The "two-Adam model" Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
- Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
- Sangre de Cristo Thomas L Moore
- Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
- Re: A Question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
- bounced again Steve Clark
- Re: A Question for TE's Russ Maatman
- Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
- Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
- Re: recent posts Stephen Jones
- I'm back BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- A question for TE's Russ Maatman
- Re: Human explosion (corrected version) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) GRMorton@aol.com
- Testing the biotic message Jeffrey S. Kramer
- Pandas debate John W. Burgeson
- Testing the biotic message Walter ReMine
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: The Two-Model Approach Steve Clark
- Re: human explosion GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Testing the "biotic message" lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: Testing Darwinism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: The Bible and Facts Stephen Jones
- Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
- Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
- Falsifiability & Supernatural Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism John W. Burgeson
- The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) John W. Burgeson
- Supernatural Walter ReMine
- Re: geocentrism chadwicka@swac.edu
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) chadwicka@swac.edu
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Re: asdf Dave Probert
- The nerve of mechanism GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Supernatural (was The Two-Model Approach) GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: The Two-Model Approach Walter ReMine
- Unidentified subject! Dave Probert
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Falsifiability (was Testing Darwinism, part 2) Walter ReMine
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
- Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
- Re: The Two-Model Approach GRMorton@aol.com
- Mechanism vs. pantheism GRMorton@aol.com
- Mechanism vs. pantheism GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: The Two-Model Approach Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
- Falsifiability JHOFMANN@CCVAX.FULLERTON.EDU
- Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
- Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Clark
- The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Walter ReMine
- Testing the Biotic Message (was Testing Darwinism) Walter ReMine
- Testing atomism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Clark
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Clark
- "seeing" atoms GRMorton@aol.com
- New version of hominids FAQ Jim Foley
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Walter ReMine
- "seeing" atoms SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
- Re: Testing Darwinism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
- Re: Popper's recantation GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
- Goodbye Gordon Simons
- Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Re: Theological reasons for macroevolution (long) #5 Stephen Jones
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Re: Testing Darwinism BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
- Re:Popper's recantation Gordon Simons
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Anonsen/GPS
- Re:Popper's recantation Gordon Simons
- Re:Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
- Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Walter ReMine
- Re:Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
- Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
- New hominid discovery GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Kevin Wirth
- Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
- Re:Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
- [Fwd: So long for now] Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
- Homeotic genes Terry M. Gray
- Re: evolution@calvin.edu GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Comments on conservation of regulatory elements Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re:Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
- Additional points on evolution Terry M. Gray
- Re: Popper's recantation Terry M. Gray
- Re: Popper's recantation John P Turnbull
- Re: evolution@calvin.edu John W. Burgeson
- Homeotic genes Arthur V. Chadwick
- Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) Walter ReMine
- Re: Popper's recantation lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- Re: TE/PC intervention/guidance lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- List problems Terry M. Gray
- Re: Popper's recantation DONALD FRACK
- Re: Self-organization Terry M. Gray
- Re: Self-organization Terry M. Gray
- Pearce's Who is Adam? GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: The "two-Adam model" GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: The "two-Adam model" GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Are we getting somewhere? Stephen Jones
- Re: Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
- Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
- Re: Theological reasons for macroevolution (long) #4 Stephen Jones
- Re: The "two-Adam model" (was flood models #3) Stephen Jones
- Re: The "two-Adam model" (was flood models #3) Stephen Jones
- Re: Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
- Mess up. GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Some literature suggestions re NS, etc. Bill Davis
- Some literature suggestions re NS, etc. John W. Burgeson
- Re: Hominids and hard evidence Jim Foley
- Re: Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
- The naked truth Gordon Simons
- Science, truth, risks John W. Burgeson
- Re: human activities Jim Foley
- Hominids and hard evidence Jim Bell
- Re: Popper's recantation John W. Burgeson
- Science, truth, risks David J. Tyler
- burials GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances GRMorton@aol.com
- simulations lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
- A hope for the future jGibson
- Re: human activities Jim Foley
- Re: Popper recantation Bill Hamilton
- Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances Jim Bell
- Re: Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
- Re: The Bible and Facts David J. Tyler
- Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances GRMorton@aol.com
- Infamous quotes Brian D. Harper
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- [BATTSON@id.ucsb.edu: Stasis and Agnostic Science] John W. Burgeson
- Art as evidence of humanity John W. Burgeson
- [BATTSON@id.ucsb.edu: Stasis and Agnostic Science] Dave Probert
- Re: Theology re: Revelation Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwinism's impact Stephen Jones
- Re: The Bible and Facts Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwinism's impact Stephen Jones
- Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances Jim Bell
- fossil man and body paint GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: Human explosion (fwd) David J. Tyler
- Re: Darwinism's impact Gordon Simons
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again)] Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwinism's impact Stephen Jones
- Re: Flatland (was human explosion (fwd)) Stephen Jones
- Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
- The humble burin:source of spirituality GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: TE/PC intervention/guidance Stephen Jones
- Re: NYT article on abiogenesis Stephen Jones
- Atheism of the Gaps John P Turnbull
- Re: Popper's "Recantation" Brian D. Harper
- Re: apologetics michael farley
- Re: human explosion GRMorton@aol.com
- apologetics Robert Pyne
- Atheism of the Gaps Troy Britain
- Re: human explosion (fwd) Bill Hamilton
- Re: Popper's "Recantation" (was Geocentrism and other issu Stephen Jones
- Re: Intervention and other issues Stephen Jones
- Re: apologetics Dave Probert
- Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
- Re: Atheism of the Gaps Jim Foley
- apologetics Robert Pyne
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- apologetics Bill Hamilton
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
- human activities GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
- Re: apologetics Dave Probert
- Re: Atheism of the Gaps Dave Probert
- The "game" of science John W. Burgeson
- Re: human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
- Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
- Re: Two-"Adam" model (was flood models #1...) Stephen Jones
- Atheism of the Gaps Jim Bell
Last message date: Sun 31 Dec 1995 - 23:26:50 EST
Archived on: Mon Jan 01 1996 - 21:27:31 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.