Re: Human explosion (fwd)
BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net ("BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net")
Mon, 20 Nov 1995 18:08:30 +0000> >> What is "them? What would you like to see an hypothesis concerning?
> >> This is a big world....
> >
> >Why creationism, of course. Science has been calling for a
> >scientific hypothesis of creationism ever since Henry Morris cranked
> >out _Genesis Flood_ in 1961 and we're still waiting.
>
> As I stated earlier there is no comprehensive theory of everything. Can you
> choose some particular subject that you would like to see an hypothesis
> concerning? Creationism is a bit broad for a theory. If you don't think you
> can narrow the subject down a little, how about offering a definition of
> creationism, so that I can at least have an idea of what you are expecting!
Funny, there is a comprehensive theory of evolution, why isn't there
one for creationism? I'm not asking you to post it, I just want to
know where it is. Post the journal reference. What book is it in?
What is the ISBN? If you cannot post something like this, then I
guess we have to conclude that there *IS* no "theory" of creationism.
-Brian