<< Then you acknowledge that fossil man engaged in speech even if slow and
cumbersome. I will accept that. If he spoke, then he must have been human,
and thus a descendant of Adam (unless you now believe that fossil man evolved
into Adam).>>
Er, no. Read carefully what Mr. Foley wrote. You will not find such a
conclusion. [Key terms: "Doesn't prove it" and "should not be accepted as a
done deal" and "does not necessarily equate to a limited language
capability"].
Human? No.
Jim