Much of my earlier reply to David Tyler argued against this.
>>The bottom line is that a truly agnostic science allows the empirical
possibility of intelligent design (including fabrication). And that is all we
need to ask for. How could anyone rationally argue against such a request?
>>
If my reply on this to David is not rational, it is my poor choice of
wording and argumentation; others have said it better than I.
Burgy