>Long-winded posts also tend
>to have errors, evasions, and obfuscations.
>I value clarity highly, and believe it is
>worth the price of fighting for.
:-)
>In any issue there are thousands of ambiguities, confusions, and side-issues
>that can be raised, (and some opponents revel in that).
This is a long winded way to explain what it is like to shovel fog with a
pitchfork.
>I am in the unique position (unlike other's on this reflector) of having to
>dismantle long-held, deeply ingrained evolutionary illusions.
Indeed!
>Before long it
>inevitably happens, evolutionists complain that I am accusing them of
>conspiracy and of intentionally misleading others. When that is their
>focus, then I know they're losing it.
I refer the reader to Walter's response to me on 11/16, I quote,
"Note: The beginning of this present post makes some interesting points.
The second half rebuts the many times Steve mis-represented me."
Better start looking for it, Walter.
>I meet evolutionists on their turf, on their terms, and without religious
>arguments. They claim they've always wanted that from creationists. This
>argumentation style is a refreshing change for creationists, and long
>overdue.
Phil Johnson does a nice enough job of it, thank you. I see that he gets
all the speaking engagements too!.
__________________________________________________________________________
Steven S. Clark, Ph.D. Phone: (608) 263-9137
Associate Professor FAX: (608) 263-4226
Dept. of Human Oncology and email: ssclark@facstaff.wisc.edu
UW Comprehensive Cancer Ctr
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53792
"Since Ptolemy was once mistaken over his basic tenants, would it not be
foolish to trust what moderns are saying now?" Montaigne, An Apology for
Raymond Sebond, 1580
__________________________________________________________________________