>And when was the last time you saw a "retraction" from the evolutionists?
>Every single problem becomes fodder for a new variation on Naturalism. The
>famous gaps in the fossil record, for example, become, presto changeo, punk
>eek! And if someone has the temerity to point out that this merely draws
>attention to the lack, Mr. S. J. Gould or his analog huffs and puffs and
>expresses discontent that "his" work should give "aid and comfort" to the
>"creationists."
>
Perhaps what you consider a refutation doesn't qualify as a refutation from
their point of view.
Bill Hamilton | Vehicle Systems Research
GM R&D Center | Warren, MI 48090-9055
810 986 1474 (voice) | 810 986 3003 (FAX)
hamilton@gmr.com (office) | whamilto@mich.com (home)