ASA - November 2007 By Date
719 messages
:
Starting
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 00:35:45 EDT,
Ending
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 22:42:45 EST
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 22:41:35 EST
[asa] Evolution in the Bible
Randy Isaac
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 21:47:10 EST
Re: [asa] Kirk on C14 contamination
Kirk Bertsche
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 21:24:20 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 20:52:37 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 20:36:29 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 20:11:55 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham, Wollemi pine)
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 19:58:41 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham, Wollemi pine)
Randy Isaac
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 19:46:29 EST
RE: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 19:34:10 EST
Re: [asa] Kirk on C14 contamination
Kirk Bertsche
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 18:50:34 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham, t. rex blood)
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 18:51:07 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 18:36:42 EST
RE: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:51:45 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:51:58 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:39:43 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:18:35 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 17:03:52 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
philtill@aol.com
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:57:04 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:48:28 EST
RE: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
John Walley
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:47:58 EST
RE: [asa] Kirk on C14 contamination
Jon Tandy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:42:39 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Campbell
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:33:25 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:06:49 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
David Campbell
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 15:42:16 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
philtill@aol.com
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 15:49:30 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 15:46:51 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham, t. rex blood)
David Campbell
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 15:37:50 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 15:29:40 EST
[asa] Kirk on C14 contamination
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 15:05:27 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
philtill@aol.com
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 14:40:13 EST
RE: [asa] yec clain (flood and oil)
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 14:35:44 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 14:31:45 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 14:18:32 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 13:30:31 EST
Re: [asa] yec clain (flood and oil)
Don Winterstein
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 13:24:59 EST
Re: [asa] St. Andrew & natural theology
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 13:20:49 EST
Re: [asa] Ken Miller: Evolangelist
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 13:03:28 EST
Re: [asa] Ken Miller: Evolangelist
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 12:45:58 EST
RE: [asa] St. Andrew & natural theology
John Walley
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 12:34:59 EST
[asa] St. Andrew & natural theology
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 12:24:57 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent Monism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 11:54:09 EST
[asa] Re: Silent Monism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 10:24:19 EST
RE: [asa] Re: Silent Monism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 11:51:50 EST
[asa] some guiltless fun
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 10:28:08 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Graham E. Morbey
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 08:50:49 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
George Murphy
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 05:34:07 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
Michael Roberts
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 05:39:31 EST
[asa] Ken Miller: Evolangelist
John Walley
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 23:15:55 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Christine Smith
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 20:40:39 EST
RE: [asa] Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 20:12:46 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 20:09:01 EST
[asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 20:00:24 EST
RE: [asa] Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 19:49:34 EST
RE: [asa] Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 19:46:25 EST
[asa] Re: Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Steve Martin
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 19:36:29 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Steve Martin
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 18:27:01 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 18:15:53 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Steve Martin
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 18:10:23 EST
RE: [asa] Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 17:43:38 EST
[asa] Silent MNism was [Definition for MN in PSCF 2007]
Gregory Arago
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 17:27:00 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 17:15:24 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
Steve Martin
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:43:24 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
Jon Tandy
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:20:31 EST
Re: [asa] Creationism in Europe
gordon brown
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 16:11:59 EST
RE: [asa] yec clain (flood and oil)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:55:29 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham, Wollemi pine)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:42:59 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham, t. rex blood)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 15:31:02 EST
RE: [asa] Creationism in Europe (who is the creationist?)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 14:21:14 EST
[asa] Creationism in Europe
j burg
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:59:40 EST
Re: [asa] creation: T. Rex.
David Campbell
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:47:52 EST
Re: [asa] Islamic Creationist
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:48:06 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
David Campbell
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:22:03 EST
Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Campbell
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 13:20:03 EST
[asa] Dinosaur Graveyard - New Reasons For Their Extinction
Janice Matchett
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 12:46:48 EST
Re: [asa] Islamic Creationist
David Campbell
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 12:38:51 EST
Re: [asa] Islamic Creationist
gordon brown
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 12:27:30 EST
Re: [asa] Will science always find a way?
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 12:16:07 EST
Re: [asa] Will science always find a way?
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:59:31 EST
"Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:40:29 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:44:25 EST
Re: [asa] Islamic Creationist
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:42:50 EST
Re: [asa] Will science always find a way?
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:26:29 EST
Re: [asa] Will science always find a way?
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 11:19:48 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
George Murphy
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:43:58 EST
Re: [asa] Will science always find a way?
cmekve@aol.com
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:43:37 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Jim Armstrong
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 10:37:08 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 09:34:27 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
George Murphy
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 08:44:02 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 29 2007 - 08:00:56 EST
Re: [asa] Will science always find a way?
David Opderbeck
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 23:53:19 EST
[asa] Islamic Creationist
gordon brown
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 22:43:46 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Merv
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 21:06:18 EST
[asa] Response to PBS-Nova
Randy Isaac
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 20:32:21 EST
RE: [asa] The cat strikes again!
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 20:00:39 EST
[asa] Will science always find a way?
Randy Isaac
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 17:10:48 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 17:07:56 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:56:47 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
James Mahaffy
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 16:51:32 EST
theology-science interaction (Was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")
George Murphy
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 14:40:01 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 14:31:25 EST
RE: [asa] The cat strikes again!
Alexanian, Moorad
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 14:21:18 EST
Re: [asa] The cat strikes again!
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 14:14:34 EST
RE: [asa] The cat strikes again!
Jon Tandy
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 14:01:35 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Janice Matchett
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 14:00:39 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Christine Smith
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 13:58:43 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
gordon brown
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 13:56:35 EST
RE: [asa] The cat strikes again!
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 13:28:00 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Jon Tandy
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 13:09:16 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:50:40 EST
Re: [asa] The cat strikes again!
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:48:27 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:47:16 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:45:38 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:40:11 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Jim Armstrong
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 12:39:58 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Jim Armstrong
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 11:36:13 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Steve Martin
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:40:12 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
George Murphy
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 10:35:49 EST
Re: [asa] The cat strikes again!
philtill@aol.com
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 09:09:08 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Alexanian, Moorad
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:34:13 EST
Re: [asa] The cat strikes again!
George Murphy
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 06:06:23 EST
Re: [asa]
Iain Strachan
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 00:30:24 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
gordon brown
Wed Nov 28 2007 - 00:00:39 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 23:47:16 EST
Re: [asa] creation: T. Rex.
Keith Miller
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 22:35:11 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 22:33:40 EST
Re: [asa] creation: T. Rex.
Randy Isaac
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 22:04:11 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
John Walley
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 21:33:43 EST
Re: [asa] creation: T. Rex.
George Murphy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 21:21:34 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
Christine Smith
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 20:30:25 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
Merv
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:30:30 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:11:52 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
George Murphy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:10:50 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Jim Armstrong
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:05:56 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
George Murphy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 19:03:47 EST
RE: [asa] creation: The Flood
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:58:19 EST
Re: [asa] Can we create life?
George Murphy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:56:20 EST
RE: [asa] creation: T. Rex.
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 18:13:34 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
mlucid@aol.com
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:53:39 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:53:40 EST
Re: [asa] Can we create life?
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:46:33 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:44:38 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:36:20 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:32:10 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
mrb22667@kansas.net
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:28:11 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:24:38 EST
[asa] Can we create life?
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:21:55 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:10:55 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:05:41 EST
[asa] The cat strikes again!
j burg
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 17:00:21 EST
[asa]
j burg
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 16:58:10 EST
RE: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
Christine Smith
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 16:30:02 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
John Walley
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 16:04:57 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
mlucid@aol.com
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:58:12 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
John Walley
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:53:20 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:50:34 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
mlucid@aol.com
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:50:31 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:45:44 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:43:35 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (Ken Ham)
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:22:36 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
George Murphy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:47:01 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:41:49 EST
Fw: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
John Walley
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:24:22 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:18:28 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Jim Armstrong
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 14:04:43 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:43:53 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (t.rex and kangaroo's)
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:25:27 EST
Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:15:17 EST
[asa] New Possible Scenario for First Life
Jim Armstrong
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:00:06 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 12:44:33 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark (t.rex and kangaroo's)
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 12:04:36 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:42:08 EST
RE: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:33:01 EST
RE: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 11:16:14 EST
RE: [asa] Loading the ark
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 09:48:38 EST
Re: [asa] yec clain
Don Winterstein
Tue Nov 27 2007 - 02:10:05 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 23:14:04 EST
Re: [asa] Can biology do better than faith?
Janice Matchett
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 23:01:13 EST
[asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More"
John Walley
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 19:24:49 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
gordon brown
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:31:35 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:34:38 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 18:23:45 EST
Re: [asa] Can biology do better than faith?
philtill@aol.com
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 17:58:56 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark
George Cooper
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 17:46:06 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
George Cooper
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 17:11:56 EST
Re: [asa] Loading the ark
George Murphy
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:47:06 EST
Re: [asa] Can biology do better than faith?
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:44:14 EST
Re: [asa] CSI and ID
Gregory Arago
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:37:23 EST
[asa] Loading the ark
David Campbell
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 15:33:44 EST
Re: [asa] angelic footprint
David Campbell
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 14:30:48 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Dave Wallace
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 14:26:19 EST
Re: [asa] Can biology do better than faith?
David Campbell
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 14:14:54 EST
Re: [asa] Can biology do better than faith?
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 13:53:39 EST
Re: [asa] Can biology do better than faith?
David Opderbeck
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 13:38:41 EST
[asa] Can biology do better than faith?
John Walley
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 12:57:10 EST
Fw: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 11:57:58 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
gordon brown
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 10:36:38 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
George Cooper
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 08:33:22 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
Merv
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 08:13:15 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 06:57:46 EST
Re: [asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
Steve Martin
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 06:10:35 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
Jack
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 04:31:27 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
Iain Strachan
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 01:17:56 EST
Re: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
PvM
Mon Nov 26 2007 - 00:12:14 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
IW
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 20:24:00 EST
RE: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 19:52:51 EST
RE: [asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 19:01:13 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 18:40:54 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 18:01:33 EST
Re: [asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
Keith Miller
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 17:54:38 EST
[asa] Sunday School for Atheists...
John Walley
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 17:40:32 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 16:45:19 EST
Re: [asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
Merv
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 16:36:27 EST
Re: [asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
George Murphy
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 15:49:43 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 15:37:00 EST
RE: [asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
Behnke, James
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 15:20:50 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
David Clounch
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 14:49:04 EST
[asa] CSI and ID
Randy Isaac
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 12:39:09 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 10:22:31 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 09:50:58 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 09:38:41 EST
Re: [asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
Merv
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 09:29:31 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Iain Strachan
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 08:56:55 EST
RE: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 02:14:22 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
Charles Carrigan
Sun Nov 25 2007 - 00:59:17 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 23:50:21 EST
Re: [asa] yec clain
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 23:04:54 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 22:50:25 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 21:25:05 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
Mountainwoman
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 20:11:17 EST
[asa] angelic footprint
Randy Isaac
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 19:50:02 EST
Re: [asa] yec clain
Don Winterstein
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 19:48:09 EST
[asa] Definition for MN in PSCF Sept. 2007 issue: consenus definition?
Steve Martin
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 18:54:48 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
Merv
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 18:46:00 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 18:31:25 EST
Re: [asa] proving god
Don Winterstein
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 16:17:08 EST
[asa] proving god
j burg
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 15:47:51 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 14:26:40 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 14:00:11 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 13:50:14 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 13:45:46 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
d.nield@auckland.ac.nz
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 13:42:26 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 13:09:16 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 12:36:26 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 11:49:08 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin
Mountainwoman
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 09:56:33 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 09:50:01 EST
[asa] yec clain
john burgeson
Sat Nov 24 2007 - 00:01:12 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
gordon brown
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 22:28:16 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 19:34:47 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 18:43:40 EST
Re: [asa] Bioanthropic Principle WAS Life Imperative
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 18:34:30 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne, 'natural' Science and 'intelligent design'
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 18:12:02 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne, 'natural' Science and 'intelligent design'
Gregory Arago
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 17:52:05 EST
[asa] Bioanthropic Principle WAS Life Imperative
John Walley
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 17:35:39 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 17:08:30 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 16:35:17 EST
Re: [asa] Life Imperative
David Heddle
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 16:15:54 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Iain Strachan
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 15:57:53 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 15:44:45 EST
Re: [asa] Latest YEC claim
George Murphy
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 15:13:28 EST
[asa] Latest YEC claim
john burgeson
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 15:11:39 EST
Re: [asa] Life Imperative
Loren Haarsma
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 14:57:15 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 14:22:30 EST
[asa] Life Imperative
David Heddle
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 13:47:20 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 14:04:02 EST
Re: [asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
philtill@aol.com
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 13:11:42 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
philtill@aol.com
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 13:02:10 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:27:54 EST
[asa] Historical Theology and Current Theology re: Original Sin & Monogenism
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:27:14 EST
[asa] Fwd: Thank you to the participants of the ASA list
Terry M. Gray
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:13:33 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
George Murphy
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:55:16 EST
RE: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Dick Fischer
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:44:01 EST
RE: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
John Walley
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:28:05 EST
RE: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
John Walley
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:11:14 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
George Murphy
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 11:00:32 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Jim Armstrong
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 09:49:02 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Iain Strachan
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 09:39:41 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 09:34:37 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 09:29:48 EST
RE: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
John Walley
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 09:14:12 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 08:59:27 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
George Murphy
Fri Nov 23 2007 - 04:03:46 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Iain Strachan
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 18:34:37 EST
RE: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Dick Fischer
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 18:11:23 EST
Re: [asa] random evolution
PvM
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 17:10:53 EST
Re: [asa] random evolution
PvM
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 14:44:29 EST
Re: [asa] random evolution
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 12:11:26 EST
Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
Michael Roberts
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 05:44:56 EST
[asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20
John Walley
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 04:43:44 EST
[asa] Signing off this thread - Intellectually fulfilled TE WAS Romans 1:20
John Walley
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 00:50:36 EST
Re: [asa] Happy Thanksgetting to all
Janice Matchett
Thu Nov 22 2007 - 00:10:56 EST
Re: [asa] Theory of gravity
Charles Carrigan
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 23:57:49 EST
Re: [asa] random evolution
PvM
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 23:42:04 EST
Re: [asa] Theory of gravity
mrb22667@kansas.net
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 22:54:50 EST
Re: [asa] Theory of gravity
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 17:52:02 EST
Re: [asa] Happy Thanksgetting to all
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 17:46:11 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Randy Isaac
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 17:09:18 EST
[asa] Happy Thanksgetting to all
john burgeson
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 17:08:09 EST
Re: [asa] Theory of gravity
Randy Isaac
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 16:31:36 EST
[asa] seminar-Animal Welfare & Global Sustainability: Fri. Nov. 30, 3:30
Loren Haarsma
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 13:34:14 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 13:29:26 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
mlucid@aol.com
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 12:46:05 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Rich Blinne
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 11:00:28 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 09:55:18 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Rich Blinne
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 09:07:51 EST
RE: [asa] Theory of gravity
Jon Tandy
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 08:31:14 EST
RE: [asa] Theory of gravity
John Walley
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 08:18:33 EST
Re: [asa] Theory of gravity
Merv
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 08:17:05 EST
Re: [asa] Theory of gravity
George Murphy
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 08:06:03 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Wed Nov 21 2007 - 07:23:11 EST
[asa] Theory of gravity
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 22:22:13 EST
[asa] random evolution
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 18:33:08 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
Merv
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 18:31:43 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 18:11:59 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne, 'natural' Science and 'intelligent design'
George Murphy
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 15:37:10 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 15:17:51 EST
Re: [asa] skin -> stem cells
Rich Blinne
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 13:57:32 EST
[asa] skin -> stem cells
George L. Murphygmurphy@raex.com
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 12:42:10 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne, 'natural' Science and 'intelligent design'
Gregory Arago
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 12:41:57 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 12:07:30 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 11:56:55 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Chris Barden
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 10:59:25 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Rich Blinne
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 09:50:25 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
mlucid@aol.com
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 09:17:44 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Rich Blinne
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 08:35:09 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 08:06:27 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 07:38:31 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 07:31:39 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Jack
Tue Nov 20 2007 - 06:56:10 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 23:21:23 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Jack
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 21:40:44 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
George Murphy
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 20:08:23 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
George Murphy
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 20:06:00 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 19:59:27 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 19:04:11 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Jon Tandy
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 14:51:35 EST
Re: [asa] Natural theology
David Campbell
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 14:39:22 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 14:37:13 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
David Campbell
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 14:24:29 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
David Campbell
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 14:13:44 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
David Campbell
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 12:26:36 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 09:23:35 EST
Re: [asa] Natural Revelation in Context
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 19 2007 - 00:42:25 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Kirk Bertsche
Sun Nov 18 2007 - 18:32:45 EST
Re: [asa] Zeitgeist - the Movie
Roger G. Olson
Sun Nov 18 2007 - 10:37:06 EST
RE: [asa] Zeitgeist - the Movie
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Nov 18 2007 - 09:57:02 EST
Re: [asa] Zeitgeist - the Movie
Merv
Sun Nov 18 2007 - 08:30:35 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Jack
Sun Nov 18 2007 - 07:20:44 EST
Re: [asa] Zeitgeist - the Movie
George Murphy
Sun Nov 18 2007 - 02:39:16 EST
Re: [asa] Zeitgeist - the Movie
Michael Roberts
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 20:47:13 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Chris Barden
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 17:54:42 EST
[asa] Zeitgeist - the Movie
Roger G. Olson
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 11:36:31 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 10:05:25 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
Merv
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 09:59:34 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 08:32:37 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 08:24:34 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
Jon Tandy
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 08:15:27 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
John Walley
Sat Nov 17 2007 - 07:47:47 EST
[asa] Natural Revelation in Context WAS ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 22:50:00 EST
[asa] Romans 1:20
mrb22667@kansas.net
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 20:59:31 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 18:59:12 EST
RE: [asa] Young Baptist's Reason to Remain
John Walley
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:56:31 EST
[asa] Young Baptist's Reason to Remain
Jim Armstrong
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:34:43 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 17:22:36 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
mrb22667@kansas.net
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 16:06:38 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
John Walley
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:54:18 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:50:16 EST
Re: [asa] Natural Revelation in Context WAS ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:51:16 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:51:14 EST
[asa] Re: (ASA) Romans 1:20
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:33:13 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
mrb22667@kansas.net
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:17:42 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
mrb22667@kansas.net
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 14:29:50 EST
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:01:01 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
John Walley
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 12:16:50 EST
[asa] "Evolutionary Controversy and a Side of Pasta"
Christine Smith
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 11:23:41 EST
RE: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 08:24:45 EST
[asa] Natural Revelation in Context WAS ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 07:58:09 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 07:45:33 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Fri Nov 16 2007 - 07:43:20 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 23:27:23 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 19:45:07 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 18:49:38 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 17:20:53 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Michael Roberts
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 12:27:20 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
PvM
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 10:59:41 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 08:44:34 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 07:27:51 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
John Walley
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 06:52:20 EST
RE: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Jon Tandy
Thu Nov 15 2007 - 00:24:03 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 21:21:53 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Kirk Bertsche
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 19:56:45 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Randy Isaac
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 19:09:37 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 18:19:12 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
philtill@aol.com
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 18:14:16 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Don Nield
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 18:02:58 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:25:32 EST
Fw: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 17:18:17 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:24:19 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:11:29 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 16:05:01 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Jim Armstrong
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:34:39 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:16:00 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:19:28 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 13:41:13 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 13:24:47 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 12:39:33 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 11:53:16 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
George Murphy
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 11:07:04 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Freeman, Louise Margaret
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:50:59 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:36:55 EST
RE: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:07:14 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Steve Martin
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 09:04:51 EST
Re: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
George Murphy
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 08:47:16 EST
RE: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Jon Tandy
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 08:20:43 EST
RE: [asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
John Walley
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 08:14:55 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
George Murphy
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 08:05:45 EST
[asa] CDESIGN PROPONETSISTS
Jack
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 07:49:40 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Chris Barden
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 04:13:56 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Iain Strachan
Wed Nov 14 2007 - 02:42:13 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 22:20:49 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
Don Nield
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 21:40:14 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
John Walley
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 21:26:02 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 21:12:53 EST
Re: [asa] Romans 1:20
George Murphy
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:49:42 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 19:31:11 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:41:08 EST
RE: [asa] Romans 1:20
John Walley
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 18:17:02 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
philtill@aol.com
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 17:05:03 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 17:01:30 EST
Re: [asa] Museum wldly successful at isleading the naive
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 16:26:49 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' Science
Gregory Arago
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 15:59:10 EST
RE: [asa] Testimonies and Professions of Faith
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 15:49:04 EST
RE: [asa] Museum wldly successful at isleading the naive
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 15:36:38 EST
Re: [asa] Museum wldly successful at isleading the naive
George Murphy
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 14:38:33 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
gordon brown
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 12:59:39 EST
Re: [asa] FW: [ncse-news] Evolution education update
Craig Rusbult
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 12:57:50 EST
[asa] Museum wldly successful at isleading the naive
John Burgeson (Burgy)
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 12:28:47 EST
[asa] Romans 1:20
David Campbell
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 12:12:29 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
David Campbell
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 12:00:04 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
David Campbell
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 08:13:28 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
David Opderbeck
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 07:17:01 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
George Murphy
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 07:10:43 EST
RE: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 06:58:05 EST
Re: [asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
Steve Martin
Tue Nov 13 2007 - 06:05:18 EST
[asa] Fw: Fresh look at creation - article
IW
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 17:59:59 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
Dave Wallace
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 17:25:49 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
mrb22667@kansas.net
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 16:43:45 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
George Murphy
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 16:44:48 EST
Re: [asa] Rush Falls for Global Warming Denier Hoax
Rich Blinne
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 16:09:03 EST
Re: [asa] Natural theology
David Campbell
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 15:33:36 EST
Re: [asa] Rush Falls for Global Warming Denier Hoax
Janice Matchett
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 15:31:53 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 15:15:04 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
Don Nield
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 15:12:16 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Iain Strachan
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 15:03:10 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Campbell
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 14:47:36 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
David Campbell
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 14:39:47 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
gordon brown
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 14:18:24 EST
Re: [asa] Rush Falls for Global Warming Denier Hoax
Rich Blinne
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 13:39:51 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 12:26:07 EST
Re: [asa] Rush Falls for Global Warming Denier Hoax
Janice Matchett
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 11:16:59 EST
Re: [asa] Testimonies and Professions of Faith
Loren Haarsma
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 10:59:30 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
George Murphy
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:59:29 EST
[asa] Rush Falls for Global Warming Denier Hoax
Rich Blinne
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:54:59 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Jim Armstrong
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:48:20 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Steve Martin
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:44:25 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Iain Strachan
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:23:47 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
David Clounch
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 09:13:01 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 08:45:21 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 08:43:11 EST
RE: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 08:12:19 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
George Murphy
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 07:07:10 EST
RE: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
John Walley
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 07:03:51 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Iain Strachan
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 06:31:05 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 03:30:12 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Iain Strachan
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 03:24:00 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Iain Strachan
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 00:05:15 EST
RE: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Dick Fischer
Mon Nov 12 2007 - 00:05:43 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Jim Armstrong
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 23:33:33 EST
Re: [asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 22:17:10 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
Merv
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 22:19:00 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 20:34:51 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Mountainwoman
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 19:44:02 EST
Re: [asa] A Religious Proclamation for Animal Compassion
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 19:31:33 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 18:34:55 EST
[asa] Calculation of probability for life to originate on Earth unintelligently
Lawrence Johnston
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 18:28:19 EST
[asa] A Religious Proclamation for Animal Compassion
Christine Smith
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 18:08:12 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne and 'natural' science [was evolutionary process]
Gregory Arago
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 13:20:42 EST
[asa] Between the BlindSpots... WAS Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
John Walley
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 11:24:07 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Steve Martin
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 10:08:47 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Stephen Matheson
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 09:33:55 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 09:10:13 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
John Walley
Sun Nov 11 2007 - 00:02:25 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Sat Nov 10 2007 - 21:06:18 EST
Re: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Merv
Sat Nov 10 2007 - 18:07:08 EST
RE: [asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
John Walley
Sat Nov 10 2007 - 16:31:57 EST
[asa] Polkinghorne quote on time required for the evolutionary process
Steve Martin
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 23:03:01 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Don Winterstein
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 19:13:13 EST
Re: [asa] Testimonies and Professions of Faith
Merv
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 18:00:41 EST
RE: [asa] Testimonies and Professions of Faith
Behnke, James
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 17:38:05 EST
Re: [asa] Testimonies and Professions of Faith
George L. Murphygmurphy@raex.com
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:51:19 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:46:43 EST
Re: [asa] Mixter
gordon brown
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:46:24 EST
[asa] Testimonies and Professions of Faith
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:39:41 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 16:15:45 EST
[asa] Mixter
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 15:39:22 EST
[asa] FW: [ncse-news] Evolution education update: November 9, 2007
Dick Fischer
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:56:56 EST
Re: [asa] another yec museum
Don Nield
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 14:35:34 EST
[asa] another yec museum
John Burgeson (Burgy)
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:51:04 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
Janice Matchett
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:51:53 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
Jim Armstrong
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 12:20:38 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
Kirk Bertsche
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:38:23 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
George Murphy
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 11:25:49 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 09 2007 - 00:57:16 EST
RE: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
gordon brown
Thu Nov 08 2007 - 21:27:18 EST
[asa] Falwell redux
John Burgeson (Burgy)
Thu Nov 08 2007 - 21:27:27 EST
RE: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Thu Nov 08 2007 - 11:55:51 EST
Re [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Janice Matchett
Thu Nov 08 2007 - 03:27:03 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Don Winterstein
Thu Nov 08 2007 - 01:57:54 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
philtill@aol.com
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 19:38:12 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 11:44:17 EST
RE: [asa] (Collins interview) Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 08:04:43 EST
Fw: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 07:33:14 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
George Murphy
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 02:02:26 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Don Winterstein
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 01:22:09 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Don Winterstein
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 00:26:40 EST
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
PvM
Wed Nov 07 2007 - 00:11:18 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
PvM
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 23:43:54 EST
Re: [asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
mlucid@aol.com
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 20:40:38 EST
[asa] Signing off this thread - Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 18:00:53 EST
Fw: Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
IW
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 14:56:17 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 14:55:14 EST
Re: [asa] Re: (appearance of age) ASA origins
John Walley
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 13:27:46 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
Jim Armstrong
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 13:27:50 EST
RE: [asa] Re: (appearance of age) ASA origins
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 13:24:48 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
Jim Armstrong
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 12:52:09 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Keith Miller
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 12:37:37 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
George L. Murphygmurphy@raex.com
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 12:16:57 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
Jon Tandy
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 11:53:15 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 11:27:12 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
skrogh
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 11:26:54 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Kirk Bertsche
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 11:23:11 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
PvM
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 10:39:28 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 11:00:08 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs. intelligence
Iain Strachan
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 08:07:37 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 07:38:12 EST
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 07:35:12 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
George Murphy
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 07:18:14 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 07:05:14 EST
Fw: [asa] Re: (appearance of age) ASA origins
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 07:00:20 EST
Re: [asa] Re: (appearance of age) ASA origins
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 06:20:56 EST
RE: [asa] Re: (appearance of age) ASA origins
John Walley
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 06:16:41 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 05:06:56 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Iain Strachan
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 04:02:21 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
d.nield@auckland.ac.nz
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 02:18:58 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 01:47:39 EST
RE: [asa] Re: (appearance of age) ASA origins
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 01:46:51 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 06 2007 - 00:09:28 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
SteamDoc@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 23:37:16 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
PvM
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 23:29:20 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
PvM
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 23:18:29 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 23:09:39 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Christine Smith
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 23:08:27 EST
[asa] Epigeneitcs...
John Walley
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:59:06 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Jim Armstrong
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:57:06 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:54:36 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
philtill@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:32:10 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:27:03 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:26:32 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Tim Wallace
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:22:07 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Hofmann, Jim
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 22:09:09 EST
Re: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
PvM
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:58:47 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:58:51 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Randy Isaac
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:53:30 EST
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:35:06 EST
RE: [asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
John Walley
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:26:20 EST
[asa] Random and natural vs intelligence
Randy Isaac
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 21:20:47 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 20:54:25 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 19:56:52 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
philtill@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 18:37:55 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 18:20:58 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 17:09:06 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
dickfischer@verizon.net
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 15:08:31 EST
Re: [asa] Natural theology
David Campbell
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 14:50:59 EST
Re: [asa] Pathological Science and the Crisis of Modernity
PvM
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 14:39:08 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Campbell
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 14:09:58 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 13:52:39 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 13:32:09 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (OEC positions) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 12:49:51 EST
Re: [asa] Re: Origins
PvM
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 12:22:45 EST
[asa] Re: Origins
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 12:21:13 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Janice Matchett
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 12:06:45 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Janice Matchett
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:54:21 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
gordon brown
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:03:21 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
George Murphy
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 11:00:04 EST
Re: [asa] Pathological Science and the Crisis of Modernity
Janice Matchett
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:49:11 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:35:16 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (OEC positions) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:31:23 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:22:52 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dick Fischer
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:16:29 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (best evidence for evolution) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 10:10:49 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (best evidence for evolution) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Don Winterstein
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 09:57:14 EST
[asa] Re: ASA origins
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 09:56:00 EST
[asa] Re: ASA origins
mlucid@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 09:55:50 EST
[asa] Suffering, Evil and the Existence of God
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 09:42:38 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Don Winterstein
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 08:36:23 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
George Murphy
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 07:22:27 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
philtill@aol.com
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 02:44:22 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: (best evidence for evolution) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 05 2007 - 00:18:33 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Christine Smith
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 23:58:11 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 23:53:40 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Christine Smith
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 23:38:40 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Christine Smith
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 23:37:11 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (OEC positions) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 23:20:11 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 23:22:29 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:49:08 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
gordon brown
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:44:17 EST
Re: [asa] Anthony Flew: "There is a God"- How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind
PvM
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 20:10:50 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:34:45 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Dobson) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:32:46 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:24:19 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam made from dust?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 19:14:48 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (best evidence for evolution) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 18:57:37 EST
RE: [asa] (Fuzale Rana) ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 18:58:50 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 18:24:34 EST
Re: [asa] Pathological Science and the Crisis of Modernity
PvM
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 17:52:08 EST
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
IW
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 18:21:31 EST
[asa] Yet More on Antony Flew’s “Conversion”
PvM
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:35:08 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Randy Isaac
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:34:54 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 15:55:15 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Michael Roberts
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 16:02:57 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 15:50:42 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Don Nield
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 15:43:52 EST
Re: [asa] Improved view of idolatry
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 14:32:20 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 14:20:35 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:46:30 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Jack Haas
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:43:03 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:32:29 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Michael Roberts
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:31:28 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 13:12:12 EST
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 12:37:27 EST
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 12:22:22 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 12:18:15 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:56:24 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Janice Matchett
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:09:16 EST
RE: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 09:55:17 EST
Re: [asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Merv
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 08:49:33 EST
[asa] Improved view of idolatry
Don Winterstein
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 08:41:22 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
David Opderbeck
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 08:16:50 EST
Re: [asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Don Winterstein
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 06:10:31 EST
[asa] 7 Words You Can't Say in Church WAS ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 05:39:27 EST
[asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
John Walley
Sun Nov 04 2007 - 01:02:36 EST
[asa] ORIGINS: pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?
Dehler, Bernie
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 22:06:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
Christine Smith
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:18:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 17:49:43 EDT
[asa] Pathological Science and the Crisis of Modernity
Janice Matchett
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 16:46:36 EDT
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
Janice Matchett
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 16:41:36 EDT
RE: [asa] Isolated humans
Janice Matchett
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 14:30:40 EDT
Re: [asa] Undue elevation of science in (some) natural theology (was D'Souza vs. Hitchens)
Michael Roberts
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 14:02:35 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 13:37:50 EDT
[asa] RE: Undue elevation of science in (some) natural theology (was D'Souza vs. Hitchens)
John Walley
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 13:07:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 12:49:27 EDT
[asa] Undue elevation of science in (some) natural theology (was D'Souza vs. Hitchens)
SteamDoc@aol.com
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 11:11:17 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 06:56:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
George Murphy
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 04:11:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
Michael Roberts
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 02:58:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
Don Winterstein
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 01:44:56 EDT
Fwd: [asa] Isolated humans
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 01:03:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
mlucid@aol.com
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 00:25:14 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat Nov 03 2007 - 00:13:55 EDT
RE: [asa] Isolated humans
Dick Fischer
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 23:27:14 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 22:30:31 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
Jon Tandy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 21:56:49 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 21:35:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
gordon brown
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 21:12:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
dawsonzhu@aol.com
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 20:47:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
David Opderbeck
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 20:38:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
George Murphy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 19:56:52 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 19:41:56 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
Merv
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 18:36:08 EDT
RE: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate epistemologically by subjecting revealed knowledge to science
John Walley
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 18:32:04 EDT
RE: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate epistemologically by subjecting revealed knowledge to science
John Walley
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 18:28:02 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
Christine Smith
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 18:25:52 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
David Campbell
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 18:07:43 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
Terry M. Gray
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:51:28 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:41:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
George Murphy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:38:33 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate epistemologically by subjecting revealed knowledge to science
Steve Martin
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:26:56 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
George Murphy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:01:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 17:17:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Isolated humans
Freeman, Louise Margaret
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 16:59:13 EDT
[asa] Isolated humans
Randy Isaac
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 16:57:30 EDT
Fw: [asa] Natural theology
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 16:27:25 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 16:05:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
cmekve@aol.com
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 15:59:51 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
Janice Matchett
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 15:42:09 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 15:37:55 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
George Murphy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 15:13:36 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 14:56:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
cmekve@aol.com
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 14:50:58 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 14:22:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
Christine Smith
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 13:32:55 EDT
Re: [asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
mlucid@aol.com
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 11:21:05 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural theology
Terry M. Gray
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 12:07:54 EDT
[asa] Just Do It - Good Stewardship and Global Warming
Jon Tandy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 08:32:58 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
George Murphy
Fri Nov 02 2007 - 08:05:37 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
George Murphy
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 23:21:07 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
Jim Armstrong
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 19:30:17 EDT
RE: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate epistemologically by subjecting revealed knowledge to science
John Walley
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 19:05:38 EDT
Re: [asa] another physics question-information
David Campbell
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 18:28:54 EDT
RE: [asa] Natural theology
John Walley
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 18:01:57 EDT
RE: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
Dick Fischer
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 17:13:01 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
George Murphy
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 15:33:33 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 14:48:47 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 13:19:58 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 13:02:17 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
mlucid@aol.com
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 06:46:48 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
Don Winterstein
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 03:41:30 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
Michael Roberts
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 01:25:15 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
Jim Armstrong
Thu Nov 01 2007 - 00:32:56 EDT
Re: [asa] D'Souza vs. Hitchens - Surrending the debate
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Last message date
:
Fri Nov 30 2007 - 22:42:45 EST
Archived on
: Fri Nov 30 2007 - 22:42:45 EST
719 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.1.8
: Fri Nov 30 2007 - 22:42:45 EST