RE: [asa] ORIGINS: (Adam or a group of Adams?) pseudogenes are overwhelming evidence for evolution...?

From: gordon brown <gbrown@Colorado.EDU>
Date: Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:49:08 EST

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Dehler, Bernie wrote:

> I'm leaning to the TE side, and trying to decipher the Adam and Eve
> story in light of it. I hope to have a first draft by the end of the
> year. Yes, I tend to think that if evolution were true, then there is
> no unique Adam and Eve. Evolution works on groups. Also, there was no
> global flood, but OEC's already have that position... only instead of
> saying it was local, I would say there was no such flood at all. I
> think the reason for the flood and creation in Scripture is to teach a
> spiritual lesson, but they (creation with Adam and eve, and the flood)
> are not historical events. Yes, I'm not claiming the bible is inerrant,
> but I think I can still say it is "authorative."
>

Bernie,

The Bible's account of the Flood is not the only one that exists. The
Babylonians, for example, had a flood story also. If no such flood really
happened, what reason would the ancients have had to invent one?

Gordon Brown (ASA member)

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Nov 4 22:49:45 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 04 2007 - 22:49:45 EST