Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20

From: George Murphy <gmurphy@raex.com>
Date: Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:13:33 EST

Rich -

Further details on your statement below would be interesting. At the 2005 ASA annual meeting there was a symposium on ID. Dembski was one of the panelists & said, among other things, that he didn't think that ID was necessarily inconsistent with ID. If you were banned by Dembski for making such a proposal (& not just for the way you presented it) then either he has changed his mind in the intervening period or was lying when he made that irenic statement in 2005.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Rich Blinne
  To: John Walley
  Cc: Randy Isaac ; asa@calvin.edu
  Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 9:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [asa] CSI Forensics WAS Staggering drunk WAS Romans 1:20

  ... I have tried to propose a synthesis between ID and TE on the Uncommon Descent blog and got myself banned for it. ...

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Nov 23 12:16:52 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 23 2007 - 12:16:52 EST