Obviously at the physical and pheromone level this is true, but at the
spiritual level of romance and love, and macho male protection and
altruistic self sacrifice, this defies non-guided evolution and can possibly
qualify as one the "invisible things" that are "clearly seen".
Thanks
John
-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of George Murphy
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:41 PM
To: John Walley; 'David Campbell'; mrb22667@kansas.net
Cc: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
In fact pretty girls - & handsome boys - fit in perfectly with evolution
through natural selection. Those traits are clearly advantageous, ceteris
paribus, for attracting mates & passing on their genes.
Shalom
George
<http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Walley" < <mailto:john_walley@yahoo.com> john_walley@yahoo.com>
To: "'John Walley'" < <mailto:john_walley@yahoo.com> john_walley@yahoo.com>;
"'David Campbell'" < <mailto:pleuronaia@gmail.com> pleuronaia@gmail.com>; <
<mailto:mrb22667@kansas.net> mrb22667@kansas.net>
Cc: < <mailto:asa@calvin.edu> asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
And furthermore, in my opinion pretty girls make a decent rebuttal to C.S.
Lewis's claim that you can't discern whether the God of nature is a loving
God or capricious, ambivalent, etc. I think that beauty in nature,
especially feminine beauty, speaks volumes about our creator. And that is
something that a red in tooth and claw nature can't readily explain either.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: John Walley [mailto:john_walley@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:59 PM
To: 'David Campbell'; <mailto:'mrb22667@kansas.net'> 'mrb22667@kansas.net'
Cc: <mailto:'asa@calvin.edu'> 'asa@calvin.edu'
Subject: RE: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
But pretty girls definitely reflect the glory of His Creation and could
therefore loosely fall under the scope of Romans 1:20. :)
John
-----Original Message-----
From: <mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu> asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu
[mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of David Campbell
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:24 PM
To: <mailto:mrb22667@kansas.net> mrb22667@kansas.net
Cc: <mailto:asa@calvin.edu> asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Romans 1:20 (disregard my last post)
> > Suppose then this person converts to deism still from a purely secular
point
> > of view and then starts exploring all the world's religions to see if
any of
> > their testable truth claims can survive the scrutiny of being compared
to
> > the scientific record. And suppose then that after eliminating all the
> > others they conclude that Christianity is valid and real and the Bible
is
> > inspired, and therefore they become a Christian.
> >
> > In this scenario, can we so confidently say that "that natural theology
does
> > *not* lead a person to Christ" ?
I see a semantic difference here. At the ultimate level, only the
work of the Spirit can lead one to Christ. In this particular
situation, I would identify the examination of various religions as
the means used in leading to Christ, though of course God was working
though his interest in science, etc. As another example, I know of a
couple of testimonies from men who came to Christianity from other
religions. Initial motive for coming to a Christian fellowship group
was that all the pretty girls were there.
-- Dr. David Campbell 425 Scientific Collections University of Alabama "I think of my happy condition, surrounded by acres of clams" To unsubscribe, send a message to <mailto:majordomo@calvin.edu> majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message. To unsubscribe, send a message to <mailto:majordomo@calvin.edu> majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message. To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.Received on Tue Nov 20 06:57:12 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 20 2007 - 06:57:13 EST