Man, speaking of strawmen again, calling Darwinian evolution a
prevailing atheistic view. That and any other science.
Why do Christians criticize ID? Because of its scientific infertility
and its theological flaws of relying on gap arguments. Collins, in his
interview with Faz (RTB) was extremely clear on the fact that there
are no reasons to accept the ID proposal that we should assign
'design' to anything science does not understand only to find out time
after time that we are wrong.
Why do people speak out against ID? Because its proponents seem to
confuse concepts such as methodological and philosophical materialism
and call evolution a 'prevailing atheistic' viewpoint.
On 11/6/07, John Walley <john_walley@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Wayne,
>
>
> Assuming this is addressed to me, I don't view evolution as "evil". In
> fact, I think I accept all the same science on evolution as you do.
>
>
>
> What I don't accept however is the extremes that I think that many on this
> list go to to criticize ID and also to embrace the prevailing atheistic view
> of naturalistic Darwinian evolution.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Nov 7 00:12:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 07 2007 - 00:12:19 EST