Evolution - April 1996 by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Mon 01 Apr 1996 - 00:00:-48752 EDT
Ending: Tue 30 Apr 1996 - 00:00:-19891 EDT
Messages: 425

• Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] #3 Stephen Jones
• Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] #2 Stephen Jones
• Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] #4 Stephen Jones
• Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re: neo-catastrophism John W. Burgeson
• God is a Physicist bonhf-l@bgu.edu
  • Re: God is a Physicist bonhf-l@bgu.edu
• an interesting forward pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
• Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: neo-catastrophism Bill Hamilton
• Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: Genesis Flood John W. Burgeson
• Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re: FW: ACLU and free speech Asst Prof Clarence F Sills Jr
• Modelling of abiogenesis David J. Tyler
  • Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Brian D. Harper
  • Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Arthur V. Chadwick
• ACLU and free speech pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
  • Re: ACLU and free speech Jim Bell
  • Re: ACLU and free speech Jim.Foley@symbios.com
  • Re: ACLU and free speech Justin Keller
  • Re: ACLU and free speech Jim Bell
• Re: Subject: Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
• Can you be objective about evolution? pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Chuck Warman
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Steve Clark
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Steve Clark
• Re: Science: fact, fancy (and feet to fire) Steve Clark
• Re: Science and super... [2/2] Stephen Jones
• RE: What part of "no...?" Chuck Warman
• ACLU and Free Speech pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
  • Re: ACLU and Free Speech Justin Keller
• RE: ACLU and free speech James E Hopper
• What part of "no...?" John W. Burgeson
• FW: ACLU and free speech John E. Rylander
• RE: National Inquirer, Condensed Version Chuck Warman
• RE: ACLU and free speech John E. Rylander
• Can you be objective about evolution? pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
• RE: ACLU and free speech Chuck Warman
• ACLU and free speech Jim.Foley@symbios.com
• National Inquirer, Condensed Version Chuck Warman
  • Re: National Inquirer, Condensed Version Tim Ikeda
• Sagan and Swinburne Jim Bell
• Re: Science: fact, fancy (and feet to fire) Jim Bell
• Re: Alternatives: Chance & Design (was Is it soup yet? #1] Brian D. Harper
• Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re[2]: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re: Re[2]: neo-catastrophism Jim.Foley@symbios.com
• Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re[3]: neo-catastrophism David S. Buchanan
• Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: Science: fact, fancy (and feet to fire) Steve Clark
• Re[2]: neo-catastrophism David S. Buchanan
• Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re: neo-catastrophism David J. Tyler
• Re[2]: neo-catastrophism David S. Buchanan
• RE: How did we get that way? Brian D. Harper
• Re: neo-catastrophism Randy Landrum
• National Inquirer thinking James Hopper
  • Re: National Inquirer thinking Tim Ikeda
  • Re: National Inquirer thinking Jim Bell
  • Re: National Inquirer thinking Tim Ikeda
  • Re: National Inquirer thinking Jim Bell
• Re: Alternatives: Chance & Design (was Is it soup yet? #1] Stephen Jones
• Re: History of Biology Chris Wozencraft
• Can you be objective about evolution? pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
• RE: How did we get that way? Michael McCulloch
• RE: History of Biology Chuck Warman
• "TC" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• History of Biology John B. Tant
  • Re: History of Biology David S. Buchanan
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Brian D. Harper
• Re: "Primary Literature" Justin Keller
• What part of "no" don't I understand? John W. Burgeson
  • Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? Jim Bell
  • Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? Chuck Warman
  • Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? John W. Burgeson
  • Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? John W. Burgeson
  • Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? Jim Bell
  • Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? John B. Tant
• TE's vs. Naturalism lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Re: TE's vs. Naturalism Tim Ikeda
  • Re: TE's vs. Naturalism John W. Burgeson
  • Re: TE's vs. Naturalism lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Re: TE's vs. Naturalism Steve Clark
• Re: Feet to the Fire Steve Clark
• Re: "Primary Literature" Jim.Foley@symbios.com
• RE: Blurring Creation & Providence? Bill Hamilton
• Re: macro-evolution Brian D. Harper
• RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Re: Patterson's 1981 AMNH transcript (was How the Leopard. Denis Lamoureux
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations [1/2] lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re:Science and supernatural explanations v.2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: Feet to the Fire Jim Bell
• Re: Patterson's 1981 AMNH transcript (was How the Leopard. Stephen Jones
• RE: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
• Re: Willimon article Stephen Jones
• improbable == intervention ?? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Copy of: Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology John W. Burgeson
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• RE: "Primary Literature" Steve Clark
• RE: "Primary Literature" John W. Burgeson
• RE: "Primary Literature" John W. Burgeson
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Bill Hamilton
• Re: macro-evolution Brian D. Harper
• Re: Feet to the Fire Steve Clark
• logical fallacies Justin Keller
• Re: "Primary Literature" Jim.Foley@symbios.com
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Denis Lamoureux
• RE: "Primary Literature" Jim Bell
• RE: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Reference to Greenstein SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
• RE: Group Steve Clark
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Brian D. Harper
• Re[2]: Of PhDs, priests and logic David S. Buchanan
• Isochrons Glenn Morton
  • Re: Isochrons Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: Isochrons Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Isochrons Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Isochrons Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: Isochrons Bill Hamilton
• RE: Group Chuck Warman
• RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
• RE: "Primary Literature" John W. Burgeson
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Steve Clark
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Stephen Jones
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #1/2 Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
• Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
• Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #1/2 Stephen Jones
• Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
• Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Group Thomas L Moore
  • Re: Group Jim Bell
  • Re: Group Chuck Warman
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Denis Lamoureux
  • Re: Group Steve Clark
• RE: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Thomas L Moore
• RE: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Chuck Warman
• Re: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Denis Lamoureux
• Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Re: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Jim Bell
• RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
• RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
• RE: Primary literature Chuck Warman
• one more follow-up on primary literature Thomas L Moore
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Thomas L Moore
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Tim Ikeda
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Tim Ikeda
• Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
• Re: Gray on Johnson Brian D. Harper
• Re: random observations on science and the supernatural michael farley
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
• RE: "Primary literature" Jim Bell
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Jim Bell
• Re: Gray on Johnson Jim Bell
• RE: "Primary literature" Brian D. Harper
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Steve Clark
• RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
• Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic...and paranoia Jim.Foley@symbios.com
• "Primary literature" michael farley
  • Re: "Primary literature" Terry M. Gray
  • Re: "Primary literature" Bill Hamilton
  • Re: "Primary literature" Jim Bell
  • Re: "Primary literature" Jim Bell
  • Re: "Primary literature" Chuck Warman
  • Re: "Primary literature" Stephen Jones
  • Re: "Primary literature" Stephen Jones
• Re: Primary literature Steven Schimmrich
• RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
• Re: random observations on science and the supernatural michael farley
• Re: Who done it? Steven Schimmrich
• RE: "Primary literature" Terry M. Gray
• RE: "Primary Literature" Bill Hamilton
• RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
  • RE: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
• RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
• RE: "Primary literature" Justin Keller
• Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] Andrew MacRae
• Re: Who Done It? Randy Landrum
• RE: Primary Literature Steven Schimmrich
• RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
  • Re: How did we get that way? Denis Lamoureux
• RE: "Primary literature" Denis Lamoureux
• RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
• RE: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
• Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
• RE: "Primary literature" Chuck Warman
• Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Denis Lamoureux
• Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
• Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic...and paranoia Chuck Warman
• Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Thomas L Moore
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Jim Bell
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Tim Ikeda
• Re: "Primary literature" Denis Lamoureux
• Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
  • Re: neo-catastrophism Randy Landrum
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Thomas L Moore
• Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Jim Bell
• Re: Subject: Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
• Johnson and AIDS John E. Rylander
  • Re: Johnson and AIDS Steve Clark
• Who Done It? Chuck Warman
  • Re: Who Done It? Steve Clark
  • Re: Who Done It? Stephen Jones
  • Re: Who Done It? John W. Burgeson
• Re: "Primary literature" Denis Lamoureux
• "Primary literature" Jim Bell
• Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
• Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
• Quoting Jim Bell
• Re: Science and super... [2/2] Brian D. Harper
• Re: Science and super... [1/2] Brian D. Harper
• Quoting authorities Terry M. Gray
  • Re: Quoting authorities Tim Ikeda
  • Re: Quoting authorities Jim Bell
  • Re: Quoting authorities Tim Ikeda
  • Re: Quoting authorities Stephen Jones
• Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Chuck Warman
  • Re: Science and super... [2/2] Denis Lamoureux
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Steve Clark
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Chuck Warman
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Brian D. Harper
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Brian D. Harper
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
  • Subject: Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
  • Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Brian D. Harper
• river meanders Bill Hamilton
  • Re: river meanders Arthur V. Chadwick
• random observations on science and the supernatural Bill Hamilton
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Mike Behe
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Terry M. Gray
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural David J. Tyler
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural David J. Tyler
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural David J. Tyler
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Brian D. Harper
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Stephen Jones
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Denis Lamoureux
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Stephen Jones
  • Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Stephen Jones
• Goodwin and common descent Paul A. Nelson
  • Re: Goodwin and common descent Stephen Jones
• Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Denis Lamoureux
• What do you know for sure about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re:Science and supernatural events v.2 Bill Hamilton
• Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
• Noah's Flood (was Old Earth) Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: Noah's Flood (was Old Earth) Arthur V. Chadwick
• New (old) articles posted: We Believe in Creation Terry M. Gray
• Re: Is it soup yet? #1 Brian D. Harper
• Re: Old Earth Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
• Re: Old Earth Thomas L Moore
  • Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
• Re:Science and supernatural events v.2 Norm Smith
• Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Randy Landrum
• How did we get that way? Bill Hamilton
  • Re: How did we get that way? Steve Clark
  • Re: How did we get that way? Michael McCulloch
  • Re: How did we get that way? Brian D. Harper
  • Re: How did we get that way? Brian D. Harper
  • Re: How did we get that way? Bill Hamilton
  • Re: How did we get that way? Steve Clark
• Can you be objectivea about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Steve Clark
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Terry M. Gray
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? James Hopper
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Tim Ikeda
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Steve Clark
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Stephen Jones
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Brian D. Harper
  • Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: Jesus' Peculiar Truth (long) (fwd) Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Jesus' Peculiar Truth (long) (fwd) jeffery lynn mullins
• Re: Jesus' Peculiar Truth (long) (fwd) Bill Hamilton
• Re: Is it soup yet? #1 Stephen Jones
• Re: Is killing humans bad? #2 (was How to Think About Natu Stephen Jones
• Re: Week in Singapore 13-19 April 1996 Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
  • Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Denis Lamoureux
• Re: Is killing humans bad? #1 (was How to Think About Natu Stephen Jones
• Evidence for a young earth? Gordon Simons
  • Re: Old Earth Randy Landrum
• Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
• Science and supernatural events v.2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Steve Clark
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Chuck Warman
• creation-evolution program David S. Buchanan
• Re: Old Earth David J. Tyler
• Re: Science and supernatural events lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: How to Think About Naturalism lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) John W. Burgeson
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) John W. Burgeson
• various posts from Glenn Morton Bill Hamilton
  • re: various posts from Glenn Morton Bill Hamilton
• RE: Blurring Creation & Providence? Bill Hamilton
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Bill Hamilton
• Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
  • Re: Old Earth Randy Landrum
• Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Lurker Q John W. Burgeson
• Re: Questions from a Lurker Stephen Jones
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
• RE: Old Earth Stephen Jones
• Re: Creation >> assembly Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Re: Darwin's "Creator" (was Re[2]: Hello) Denis Lamoureux
• Science and supernatural explanations lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • Re: Science and supernatural explanations Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Science and supernatural explanations David J. Tyler
  • Re: Science and supernatural explanations John W. Burgeson
• Re: [really: trilobites] Andrew MacRae
• Re: Questions from a Lurker Terry M. Gray
• Re: Questions from a Lurker Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: Questions from a Lurker Terry M. Gray
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Chuck Warman
  • Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Denis Lamoureux
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Brian D. Harper
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
• Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
  • Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Denis Lamoureux
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• JESUS LOVES ME, THIS I KNOW, FOR THE BIBLE TELLS ME SO Gordon Simons
• Re: [really: trilobites] Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] Andrew MacRae
• elliott sober Steve Clark
• Re: Is it soup yet? #4 Brian D. Harper
  • Re: Is it soup yet? #4 Denis Lamoureux
• Re: Is it soup yet? #1 Brian D. Harper
• RE: Jesus' Tomb and Bones John E. Rylander
  • Re: Jesus' Tomb and Bones Dennis L. Durst
• Jesus' Tomb and Bones Steven Fawl
  • Re: Jesus' Tomb and Bones Doug and Ping-chih Keil
• Lecture by Phil Johnson at Wheaton College Bill Hamilton
• Re: How to Think About Naturalism Derek McLarnen
• Introduction Derek McLarnen
  • Re: Introduction Stephen Jones
• Tennessee Evolution Bill JHOFMANN@CCVAX.FULLERTON.EDU
• Re: Creation >> assembly lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
• Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
• Re: Interview with Dawkins Stephen Jones
• Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
• Re: Is it soup yet? #4 Stephen Jones
• RE: Kline article in PSCF (D. Kidner on Adam) Terry M. Gray
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Brian D. Harper
• RE: Old Earth Michael McCulloch
• Re: Creation >> assembly Stephen Jones
• Re: Colin Patterson/Luther Sunderland Stephen Jones
• RE: Old Earth Stephen Jones
• Re: Some old threads Stephen Jones
• Re: Colin Patterson/Luther Sunderland Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Arthur V. Chadwick
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Terry M. Gray
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Bill Hamilton
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Terry M. Gray
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Terry M. Gray
• Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Terry M. Gray
• Re: Focus on the Family Gordon Simons
• RE: Focus on the Family Chuck Warman
• Appearance of age John W. Burgeson
  • Re: Appearance of age Stephen Jones
• Re: Focus on the Family John W. Burgeson
• Re: Focus on the Family John W. Burgeson
• Re: Is it soup yet? #2 Stephen Jones
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
  • Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Denis Lamoureux
• Re: Challenge to Atheists (was How to Think About Natu Stephen Jones
• Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
• Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
• Re: An appology(?) and a Question. Denis Lamoureux
• An appology(?) and a Question. Russell T. Arndts
  • Re: An appology(?) and a Question. Gordon Simons
  • Re: An appology(?) and a Question. David J. Tyler
  • Re: Old Earth Randy Landrum
  • Re: An appology(?) and a Question. Bill Hamilton
  • Re: An appology(?) and a Question. John W. Burgeson
• unconnected for the weekend Bill Hamilton

Last message date: Tue 30 Apr 1996 - 00:00:-19891 EDT
Archived on: Tue Apr 30 1996 - 18:28:44 EDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Other mail archives