Scientists at least make an effort to be objective (even
>if total objectivity for humans is practically impossible) by having peer
>review systems and publishing discussions and replies in journals to papers
>that are controversial. Creationists do not even make an effort to be
>objective since they start with a fixed, immutable belief in the way things
>occurred.
This statement I hope does not represent the level of objectivity you
practice in your science. How can you lump ALL creationists over against
ALL scientists?
Are creationists all incapable of being scientists? That would be a strange
definition of creationist.
Art
http://chadwicka.swac.edu