quoting Hugh Ross
>In 1988 George Greenstein expressed these
>thoughts: "As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently
>arises that some supernatural agency-or, rather, Agency-must be
>involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have
>stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being?
>Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for
>our benefit?" ("Symbiotic Universe, p27)"
and in the next paragraph Greenstein writes:
A heady prospect. Unfortunately I believe it to be illusory.
As I claim mankind is not the center of the universe, as
I claim anthropism to be different from anthropocentrism,
so too I believe that the discoveries of science are not
capable of proving God's existence-not now, not ever.
And more than that: I also believe that reference to God
will never suffice to explain a single one of these
discoveries. God is not an explanation.
>(Ross H., "Astronomical
>Evidences for a Personal, Transcendent God", in Moreland J.P. ed.,
>"The Creation Hypothesis", InterVarsity Press: Illinois, 1994, p164)
>
========================
Brian Harper | "I can't take my guesses back
Associate Professor | That I based on almost facts
Applied Mechanics | That ain't necessarily so"
Ohio State University | -- Willie Nelson
========================