> Nice dodge. Your argument before was the Johnson knew something because
> he associated himself with who you assumed as "expert." Now you've
> switched to showing whether or not he was in error, which really is the
> issue. You did not defend Johnson on the basis of good arguments either,
> you defended him via argument from authority. If you have a problem with
> the "priesthood," don't invoke it as a defense.
Hey Tom,
Irony of ironies, eh? Must have something to do with a Priestly
epistemology these legal types apply that we the intellectually pagan
hoi polloi will never understand.
Regards,
Denis
----------------------------------------------------------
Denis O. Lamoureux DDS PhD PhD (cand)
Department of Oral Biology Residence:
Faculty of Dentistry # 1908
University of Alberta 8515-112 Street
Edmonton, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta
T6G 2N8 T6G 1K7
CANADA CANADA
Lab: (403) 492-1354
Residence: (403) 439-2648
Dental Office: (403) 425-4000
E-mail: dlamoure@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca
"In all debates, let truth be thy aim, and endeavor to gain
rather than expose thy opponent."
------------------------------------------------------------