ASA - November 2004 By Date
224 messages
:
Starting
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 04:57:10 EST,
Ending
Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:07:59 EST
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:06:15 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Tue Nov 30 2004 - 16:27:41 EST
Science, faith and politics
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 20:29:42 EST
Re: Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
Rich Blinne
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 18:31:20 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
RFaussette@aol.com
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 17:57:55 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
RFaussette@aol.com
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 17:08:20 EST
Re: Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
bivalve
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 16:29:47 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
Dick Fischer
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 14:51:08 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Charles Carrigan
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 13:40:46 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 13:28:58 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 13:10:41 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 12:23:44 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
RFaussette@aol.com
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 12:19:55 EST
Re: earthquake
Don Winterstein
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 10:47:15 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
George Murphy
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 10:42:58 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
George Murphy
Mon Nov 29 2004 - 00:49:13 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
Peter Ruest
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 23:53:05 EST
Re: Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
Rich Blinne
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 23:49:36 EST
Re: Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 19:53:00 EST
Re: Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
gordon brown
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 18:00:53 EST
Re: earthquake
Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 17:12:06 EST
earthquake
Wayne Shelton
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 03:46:40 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
Don Winterstein
Sun Nov 28 2004 - 01:01:13 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
Peter Ruest
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 22:23:46 EST
Re: Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
Rich Blinne
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 17:01:24 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 16:44:56 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 15:48:03 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 12:07:31 EST
Anybody See Any Holes in this Argument?
Dick Fischer
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 12:02:54 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
George Murphy
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 10:20:10 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
George Murphy
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 04:41:35 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
Don Winterstein
Sat Nov 27 2004 - 02:23:17 EST
RE: The puzzle of Adam
Don Perrett
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 23:43:08 EST
Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950
Dick Fischer
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 23:00:53 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
Dick Fischer
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 17:07:23 EST
Re: 3.14159265358979323846264338327950
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 16:32:05 EST
3.14159265358979323846264338327950
bivalve
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 15:50:29 EST
Re: Pi
bivalve
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 14:57:12 EST
Re: 50,000 Year-Old Americans?
bivalve
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 09:27:18 EST
Re: The puzzle of Adam
George Murphy
Fri Nov 26 2004 - 00:46:00 EST
The puzzle of Adam
Peter Ruest
Wed Nov 24 2004 - 19:24:06 EST
Langdon Gilkey dies
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 24 2004 - 00:49:40 EST
Re: Pi (in your face)
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 23:46:22 EST
Re: Pi
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 19:40:28 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
RFaussette@aol.com
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 17:33:33 EST
Re: Pi
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 15:35:03 EST
Re: Pi
Michael Roberts
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 16:25:41 EST
Re: Pi
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 12:52:11 EST
Re: Pi
Loren Haarsma
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 12:20:37 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Don Perrett
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 11:24:07 EST
Re: Pi
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 10:50:29 EST
RE: Pi
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 23 2004 - 09:45:06 EST
Pi
Wayne Shelton
Mon Nov 22 2004 - 18:26:19 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Nov 22 2004 - 17:37:53 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
RFaussette@aol.com
Mon Nov 22 2004 - 15:20:14 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Charles Carrigan
Mon Nov 22 2004 - 15:03:54 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Mon Nov 22 2004 - 13:17:57 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
RFaussette@aol.com
Mon Nov 22 2004 - 13:02:46 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Charles Carrigan
Sat Nov 20 2004 - 23:44:03 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Don Perrett
Sat Nov 20 2004 - 00:04:44 EST
RE: 7th Day Adventists and YECism
Rich Blinne
Fri Nov 19 2004 - 16:57:50 EST
Re: 7th Day Adventists and YECism
gordon brown
Tue Oct 19 2004 - 14:04:34 EDT
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
jack syme
Fri Nov 19 2004 - 13:11:08 EST
7th Day Adventists and YECism
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Fri Nov 19 2004 - 10:23:43 EST
RE: Clearing up a misconception
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Oct 19 2004 - 06:42:37 EDT
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
jack syme
Fri Nov 19 2004 - 00:49:09 EST
RE: Clearing up a misconception
Don Perrett
Fri Nov 19 2004 - 00:27:28 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Don Perrett
Thu Nov 18 2004 - 23:49:24 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Don Perrett
Thu Nov 18 2004 - 14:11:37 EST
Re: 50,000 Year-Old Americans?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Nov 18 2004 - 08:49:38 EST
Re: 50,000 Year-Old Americans?
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Thu Nov 18 2004 - 07:22:14 EST
50,000 Year-Old Americans?
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 17 2004 - 20:02:28 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 17 2004 - 15:18:46 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Wed Nov 17 2004 - 14:14:34 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 17 2004 - 10:43:15 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Wed Nov 17 2004 - 10:15:01 EST
The YECs are coming!
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Wed Nov 17 2004 - 09:52:48 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Tue Nov 16 2004 - 22:08:06 EST
Re: imago dei & fall
George Murphy
Tue Nov 16 2004 - 21:00:07 EST
Re: imago dei & fall
jack syme
Tue Nov 16 2004 - 17:27:09 EST
imago dei & fall
George Murphy
Tue Nov 16 2004 - 14:01:28 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Nov 16 2004 - 12:00:58 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Terry M. Gray
Tue Nov 16 2004 - 01:16:55 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
jack syme
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 21:55:09 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 18:05:25 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
jack syme
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 16:50:56 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 15:40:17 EST
2002 issues of PSCF now on-line
Terry M. Gray
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 15:36:06 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Terry M. Gray
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 15:19:01 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 15 2004 - 12:18:29 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 22:45:20 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 21:29:10 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 20:27:01 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
George Murphy
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 19:18:23 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 17:44:14 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
George Murphy
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 17:37:29 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
jack syme
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 16:43:14 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 16:16:44 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 07:57:23 EST
Fw: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Randy Isaac
Sun Nov 14 2004 - 06:25:42 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
George Murphy
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 23:11:34 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 21:28:09 EST
RE: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Alexanian, Moorad
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 21:24:00 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
George Murphy
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 20:51:35 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 20:38:01 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 20:04:19 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Terry M. Gray
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 19:35:41 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
George Murphy
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 18:40:34 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
gordon brown
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 18:54:45 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Terry M. Gray
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 16:57:05 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 14:36:07 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
jack syme
Sat Nov 13 2004 - 14:08:16 EST
Re: RE: The YECs continue
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 11:09:58 EST
Re: Gen. 1:1 as "real history" or "real philosophy?"
David Bradford
Fri Nov 12 2004 - 17:46:44 EST
Re: RE: The YECs continue
ed babinski
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 15:40:07 EST
RE: Gen. 1:1 as "real history" or "real philosophy?"
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 00:32:17 EST
Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
ed babinski
Fri Nov 12 2004 - 14:53:56 EST
RE: The YECs continue
Roberts, Joe
Fri Nov 12 2004 - 14:16:30 EST
The YECs continue
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Fri Nov 12 2004 - 11:24:56 EST
Re: Dick Fisher's "historical basis" remains no less doubtful
Dick Fischer
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 18:04:59 EST
Re: Clearing up a misconception
bivalve
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 16:17:47 EST
Re: Clearing up a misconception
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 15:59:52 EST
ICR claims, Nov 2004
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 11:24:53 EST
RE: Clearing up a misconception
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 10:52:02 EST
Clearing up a misconception
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 09:47:46 EST
News articles:
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 04:36:40 EST
RE: paper by Rowland Moss
Steve Bishop
Thu Nov 11 2004 - 02:32:15 EST
info on fasting
Don Winterstein
Wed Nov 10 2004 - 22:08:30 EST
Re: Critiques of Dick Fisher's articles advocating an historical Adam and Eve
Dick Fischer
Wed Nov 10 2004 - 16:02:02 EST
Schroedinger & other physicists praised wisdom of Hindu Vedic writings
ed babinski
Wed Nov 10 2004 - 15:53:22 EST
Re: paper by Rowland Moss
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 10 2004 - 14:14:59 EST
Dr. Rowland Moss, Christian ecologist, info
ed babinski
Wed Nov 10 2004 - 12:30:47 EST
paper by Rowland Moss
Bill Cobern
Wed Nov 10 2004 - 03:12:32 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Don Winterstein
Tue Nov 09 2004 - 22:47:17 EST
Schroedinger and Bohr
John Hewlett
Tue Nov 09 2004 - 15:17:06 EST
RE: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Roberts, Joe
Tue Nov 09 2004 - 13:28:38 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 19:54:21 EST
RE: Once you know it's false
Alexanian, Moorad
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 12:16:25 EST
Re: Once you know it's false
George Murphy
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 14:35:09 EST
Re: Once you know it's false
Jim Armstrong
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 16:55:36 EST
Re: Once you know it's false
wallyshoes
Tue Nov 09 2004 - 00:33:00 EST
[Fwd: Once you know it's false]
wallyshoes
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 18:52:16 EST
RE: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Roberts, Joe
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 18:09:28 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 18:02:49 EST
Re: Is there a Plan B? (was "Fountains of the Deep")
Vernon Jenkins
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 14:46:29 EST
RE: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Roberts, Joe
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 14:13:13 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 11:56:39 EST
Creationism
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 02:47:02 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Don Winterstein
Mon Nov 08 2004 - 00:06:01 EST
Re: Bible numbers on the ASA list
Terry M. Gray
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:49:17 EST
Re: Bible numbers on the ASA list
Michael Roberts
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 13:49:33 EST
Re: Once you know it's false
Jan de Koning
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 12:34:31 EST
Re: Once you know it's false
CMSharp01@aol.com
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:46:38 EST
Self-stymied? (was: knowledge & proof)
Vernon Jenkins
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:45:02 EST
Re: knowledge & proof
Randy Isaac
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:16:20 EST
Re: Bible numbers on the ASA list
gordon brown
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 14:29:33 EST
Re: Questions: E.Q., the Evolution of Souls, the language of Adam and Eve
Jan de Koning
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 11:50:11 EST
Once you know it's false
Jim Eisele
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 11:23:57 EST
Bible numbers on the ASA list
Terry M. Gray
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 05:33:49 EST
Re: knowledge & proof
Don Winterstein
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 03:04:25 EST
Re: knowledge & proof
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 17:42:26 EST
How to Test the Relative Value of Gematria-Based Arguments
ed babinski
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 20:15:46 EST
Re: Cetacean evolution and Michael Denton
jack syme
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 17:38:17 EST
Fruit flies and our co-inherited disease-riddled ancestry
ed babinski
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 17:17:36 EST
Cetacean evolution and Michael Denton
ed babinski
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 16:39:18 EST
Re: "Which comes first, the anatomic variation or the ability?"
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 15:49:27 EST
Re: "Which comes first, the anatomic variation or the ability?"
ed babinski
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 14:25:47 EST
Re: "Which comes first, the anatomic variation or the ability?"
drsyme@cablespeed.com
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 13:46:36 EST
"Which comes first, the anatomic variation or the ability?"
ed babinski
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 12:26:04 EST
Re: How do large complex brains evolve? Ask the toothed whales!
ed babinski
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 00:35:07 EST
Better yet, Glenn, any MRI scans? CT is old technology
ed babinski
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 23:58:52 EST
How do large complex brains evolve? Ask the toothed whales!
ed babinski
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 21:48:20 EST
Glenn, do you have info of modern day CT scans of such folks?
ed babinski
Sat Nov 06 2004 - 00:12:03 EST
Re: Questions: E.Q., the Evolution of Souls, the language of
jack syme
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 21:35:27 EST
"If we can prove to the atheist that he needs divine help."
ed babinski
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 21:13:58 EST
Questions: E.Q., the Evolution of Souls, the language of Adam and Eve
ed babinski
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 18:35:49 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 16:31:33 EST
Re: knowledge & proof
Vernon Jenkins
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 16:19:25 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Vernon Jenkins
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 13:04:19 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 12:33:02 EST
holiday
Jan de Koning
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 12:21:54 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Ted Davis
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 11:41:48 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 11:48:57 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 11:22:35 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Jack Haas
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 10:47:58 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Michael Roberts
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 10:24:58 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 08:51:26 EST
Re: knowledge & proof
Randy Isaac
Fri Nov 05 2004 - 03:56:22 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Don Winterstein
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 22:18:48 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 21:02:12 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
jack syme
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 19:53:26 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
George Murphy
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 18:11:57 EST
Re: Election
Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 16:21:03 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Michael Roberts
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 13:15:10 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 10:04:28 EST
Re: National Geographic, June 2004
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 06:52:52 EST
Re: Election
Don Winterstein
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 05:58:28 EST
Re: Election
Don Winterstein
Thu Nov 04 2004 - 04:41:15 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Don Winterstein
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 19:51:21 EST
Re: Election
Jan de Koning
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 17:42:22 EST
Re: Election
Michael Roberts
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 16:58:45 EST
National Geographic, June 2004
Either Carol or John Burgeson
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 12:12:25 EST
Re: Election
Denyse O'Leary
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 09:12:22 EST
Re: Election
Ted Davis
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 07:31:33 EST
Election
jack syme
Wed Nov 03 2004 - 06:50:42 EST
Taking a break
Glenn Morton
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 20:39:44 EST
RE: YEC's have abandoned a thick water vapor canopy hypothesis
Glenn Morton
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 20:21:52 EST
RE: Gen. 1:1 as "real history" or "real philosophy?"
Glenn Morton
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 15:00:38 EST
Without me presuming, can Glenn please explain the "serpent's curse?"
ed babinski
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 12:21:31 EST
Re: Gen. 1:1 as "real history" or "real philosophy?"
George Murphy
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 08:41:41 EST
Re: YEC's have abandoned a thick water vapor canopy hypothesis
Ted Davis
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 08:47:51 EST
RE: Gen. 1:1 as "real history" or "real philosophy?"
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Nov 02 2004 - 11:59:18 EST
Re: [ACG] election eve musing
Michael Roberts
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 20:56:14 EST
Gen. 1:1 as "real history" or "real philosophy?"
ed babinski
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 19:22:25 EST
Christians at Zygon magazine & "death" as evolutionary blessing
ed babinski
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 19:56:41 EST
RE: YEC's have abandoned a thick water vapor canopy hypothesis
Glenn Morton
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 16:32:53 EST
YEC's have abandoned a thick water vapor canopy hypothesis
ed babinski
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 19:07:22 EST
Re: Is there a Plan B? (was "Fountains of the Deep")
Dick Fischer
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 18:35:33 EST
Re: Is there a Plan B? (was: So we're all related!)
gordon brown
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 16:45:00 EST
Re: Is there a Plan B? (was: So we're all related!)
Vernon Jenkins
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 16:00:43 EST
Re: Is there a Plan B? (was "Fountains of the Deep")
Vernon Jenkins
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 14:26:05 EST
Re: knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 08:05:37 EST
Simplified Global Climate models for school use
Mccarrick Alan D CRPH
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 06:35:57 EST
FW: The wee people
Glenn Morton
Mon Nov 01 2004 - 04:57:10 EST
knowledge & proof [was "wee people"]
Don Winterstein
Last message date
:
Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:07:59 EST
Archived on
: Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:08:02 EST
224 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.1.8
: Tue Nov 30 2004 - 23:08:02 EST