Randy Isaac wrote:
> Dick's approach seems to require that Adam's sin is descriptive, rather
> than
> causative, of the human condition of sin. That however leads to other
> problems with the interpretation of "...by one man...."
Apes are capable of much of the same kinds of perservse activities men can
engage in. What makes sin "sin" is accountability. Knowing right from
wrong and choosing wrong. Adam brought a standard. Serve God, live a
rightous life.
What I see as the problem is that the traditional approach flies against the
historical evidence. My approach recognizes the historical evidence and
flies against tradition. What I need to do is get the information out there
to compete against the traditional approach, and if common sense prevails
then this methodology will prevail eventually. However, as you can see with
YEC, common sense doesn't stand a chance against the drumbeat of dogma.
Dick Fischer - Genesis Proclaimed Association
Finding Harmony in Bible, Science, and History
www.genesisproclaimed.org
Received on Sun Nov 14 16:43:34 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 14 2004 - 16:43:35 EST