evolution@calvin.edu by date

About this archive
Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon 01 Jan 1996 - 14:08:01 EST
Ending: Wed 14 Feb 1996 - 09:52:08 EST
Messages: 409

Critique of Biotic Message Terry M. Gray
Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Stephen Jones
Re: Will Provine and Howard Temin Stephen Jones
Bumblebees can't fly Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Provine and Pascal Stephen Jones
Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Stephen Jones
Re: Provine and Pascal Jim Bell
Provine and Pascal Thomas L Moore
Will Provine and Howard Temin Steve Clark
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Brian D. Harper
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Steve Clark
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Steve Clark
Re: Will Provine Jim Bell
Re: Will Provine Gordon Simons
Will Provine Gordon Simons
Eldredge/Johnson tapes Terry M. Gray
Re: God's "Randomness" (was Chance and the Hand of God) Bill Hamilton
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Patterson's lecture-American Museum of Natural History Stephen Jones
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Stephen Jones
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Stephen Jones
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Stephen Jones
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Stephen Jones
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Stephen Jones
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Stephen Jones
Re: TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Bill Hamilton
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
God's "Randomness" (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
TE and the Church (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
God's "Randomness" (was Chance and the Hand of God) Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Dean Kenyon's Address Steven Fawl
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Brian D. Harper
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Brian D. Harper
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Bill Hamilton
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Thomas L Moore
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: Philosophy of Science Stephen Jones
New England conference lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Steve Clark
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Bill Hamilton
Re: Dean Kenyon Steven Schimmrich
Re: Philosophy of Science Norm Smith
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Stephen Jones
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim Bell
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Test--ignore this message Terry M. Gray
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Stephen Jones
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Brian D. Harper
Re: Johnson-Eldredge debate Stephen Jones
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Steve Clark
Dean Kenyon (was Darwinist Macro-Evolution) Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention David J. Tyler
RE: Philosophy of Science Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Re: Philosophy of Science Stephen Jones
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Philosophy of Science Norm Smith
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Brian D. Harper
Re: Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
John Leslie? Brian D. Harper
John Leslie? Brian D. Harper
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Jim Foley
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention Brian D. Harper
Re: Design-for-self-assembly and intervention David J. Tyler
Johnson-Eldredge debate Ross Pavlac
Re: Gish's questionable statements Stephen Jones
Re: Dawkins' Bridge Deal (was Pamphlet Part V) Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Bill Hamilton
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science Bill Hamilton
Re: ID David J. Tyler
Re: Philosophy of Science Michael McCulloch
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Stephen Jones
ID John W.
Ken Ham John W.
Re: Dawkins' Bridge Deal (was Pamphlet Part V) Derek McLarnen
Re: Gish's questionable statements Derek McLarnen
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science James Bell
Re: _Reinventing Darwin_ (Book Review) Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Re: Philosophy of Science/ID Bill Hamilton
Re: design-for-self-assembly and intervention Bill Hamilton
Re: Paradigm blindness lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Paradigm blindness lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Philosophy of Science/ID lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Bill Hamilton
Re: Definition: Darwinist Macro-Evolution (was Why an eng. Stephen Jones
_Reinventing Darwin_ (Book Review) Bill Hamilton
design-for-self-assembly and intervention lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Bill Hamilton
Re: Interesting article in Science Brian D. Harper
Re: Interesting article in Science Brian D. Harper
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Stephen Jones
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Stephen Jones
Re: Darwin's deity (was Philosophy of Science) Stephen Jones
Re: Old Earth Tract-Suggestions John W. Burgeson
Re: Philosophy of Science/ID Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science/ID David J. Tyler
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Bill Hamilton
Re: Age distribution of reflectorites Gordon Simons
Re: Darwin's deity (was Philosophy of Science) Bill Hamilton
Complexity Definitions Brian D. Harper
Interesting article in Science Bill Hamilton
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... David J. Tyler
Re: 135 million year old bacteria Steven Fawl
Re: 135 million year old bacteria Stephen Jones
Re: Darwin's deity (was Philosophy of Science) Stephen Jones
Algorithmic Complexity [2/2] Brian D. Harper
Algorithmic Complexity [2/2] Brian D. Harper
Algorithmic Complexity [2/2] Brian D. Harper
Algorithmic Complexity [1/2] Brian D. Harper
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... Bill Hamilton
Re: Paradigm blindness David J. Tyler
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic ... David J. Tyler
Re: Philosophy of Science/ID Steve Clark
Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
Re: Rock Strata & the Bible Record Stephen Jones
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
Quibble re terminology (was re: Philosophy of Science) Bill Hamilton
Re: Gish's questionable statements Jim Foley
Re: Philosophy of Science Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
Index Fossils Norm Smith
135 million year old bacteria Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Why an engineer goes ballistic when scientists slight Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science/ID Stephen Jones
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Stephen Jones
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Brian D. Harper
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Bill Hamilton
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Bill Hamilton
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Brian D. Harper
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Jim Foley
Re: Chance and the Hand of God Brian D. Harper
Rules and index fossils Russell T. Arndts
Rock Strata & the Bible Record John W. Burgeson
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Brian D. Harper
Re: question on algorithmic complexity Brian D. Harper
Re: TE or PC? Bill Hamilton
Re: Gish's questionable statements Jim Foley
Majordomo results--so how do i get off this list?? Nancy Biggins
Re: Philosophy of science/ID lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: TE or PC? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
"Paradigm blindness" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Gish's questionable statements Stephen Jones
question on algorithmic complexity Bill Hamilton
Greeting to Group Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Chance and the Hand of God Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Philosophy of Science/ID David J. Tyler
Re: index fossils Norm Smith
Why an engineer goes ballistic when scientists slight design Bill Hamilton
Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA Bill Hamilton
Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA Steve Clark
Re: index fossils Andrew MacRae
Re: Philosophy of Science Steve Clark
Pamphlet Project vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fi Russell T. Arndts
Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fi DRATZSCH@legacy.calvin.edu
Re: Gish's questionable statements Brian D. Harper
Re: Gish's questionable statements Bill Hamilton
Re: Back Issues of Reflector (was Philosophy of science/ID Stephen Jones
Re: Back Issues of Reflector (was Philosophy of science/ID Stephen Jones
Re: Gish's questionable statements Jim Foley
Re: Index fossils and logic Andrew MacRae
Philosophy of science/ID David J. Tyler
Index fossils and logic Russell T. Arndts
Re: Gish's questionable statements Brian D. Harper
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science Brian D. Harper
Re: Gish's questionable statements Stephen Jones
The subject should "questionable logic." Russell T. Arndts
Re: Age distribution of reflectorites Russell T. Arndts
Re: Age distribution of reflectorites Gordon Simons
Gish's questionable statements Bill Hamilton
Re: Philosophy of Science / I.D. Jim Bell
Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fi Stephen Jones
Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
Re: Philosophy of Science / I.D. lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Complexity Brian D. Harper
Re: Complexity Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Jim Foley
Complexity John W. Burgeson
Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA John W. Burgeson
Re: Hominid FAQ & OEC (was pamphlet Part III) Jim Foley
Re: Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
Re: Science as a game: unfortunate choice of words? John W. Burgeson
Brian wrote: Re: Faith First? John W. Burgeson
Re: Noll, Creationism & the ASA HOWARDLION@aol.com
Re: Philosophy of Science Brian D. Harper
Re: Philosophy of Science Brian D. Harper
Re: Dawkins' Deception? (was Pamphlet Part V) Stephen Jones
Re: Hominid FAQ & OEC (was pamphlet Part III) Stephen Jones
Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
Re: Speciation (was Fwd: New Phylum found) Stephen Jones
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
Re: Glenn Morton Stephen Jones
Re: Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fit the paradigm? Andrew MacRae
Re: There should be whole books about it. Jim Foley
There should be whole books about it. Russell T. Arndts
Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fit the paradigm? Jim Foley
Philosophy of Science Jim Bell
Must the rules merely be that the index fossil must fit the paradigm? Russell T. Arndts
Re: Science as a game: unfortunate choice of words? David J. Tyler
Science as a game: unfortunate choice of words? John W. Burgeson
Re: New phylum Stephen Jones
Yes, lets find the written rules. Russell T. Arndts
age of reflectorites etc Nancy Biggins
Re: Age distribution of reflectorites Eddie G. Olmstead, Jr.
Re: Age distribution of reflectorites Steve Clark
Re: Rules Jim Foley
Re: Rules Bill Hamilton
Age distribution of reflectorites Gordon Simons
Rules Russell T. Arndts
Science as a game: unfortunate choice of words? Bill Hamilton
Re: TE or PC? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: PC/TE definitions... lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: PC/TE #1 (was PC/TE definitions, misperceptions...) Stephen Jones
Re: Goodbye Stephen Jones
Re: The Game of Science (was Human explosion (fwd)) Stephen Jones
Re: The Game of Science (was Human explosion (fwd)) Stephen Jones
Re: Tough love Stephen Jones
Re: Faith First? Bill Hamilton
Re: Faith First? Brian D. Harper
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Jim Bell
Re: Faith First? Jim Bell
Re: Goodbye, Glenn Bill Hamilton
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
Inefficient Design Argument John W. Burgeson
Re: Goodbye, Glenn Jim Bell
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Jim Bell
Re: pamphlet Part III Jim Foley
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Jim Foley
Re: An Apology For Stephen Jones Stephen Jones
Re: pamphlet Part III Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Re: New Phylum found Stephen Jones
Re: Gish's honesty (was Genetic Similarity) Stephen Jones
Re: TE or PC? Stephen Jones
Re: Dawkins speaks for Science? (was How should Christians Stephen Jones
Re: Gn 1:1 an "executive summary"? (was Drawing Glenn....) Stephen Jones
Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Brian D. Harper
Evil Ross Pavlac
Re: Fwd: New Phylum found Arthur V. Chadwick
Stonekings Eve II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Pamphlet Part V (fwd) vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Glenn Morton Bill Hamilton
Re: Pamphlet Part V vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Stoneking's Eve Jim Foley
Glenn Morton vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Broca's Area Jim Foley
Copy of: Re: Coincidences (was free will/determinism and God's plan John W. Burgeson
Copy of: Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Copy of: Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Fwd: New Phylum found Bill Hamilton
Re: Goodbye GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Stoneking's Eve GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Stoneking's Eve GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's Area GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Pamphlet Part V Derek McLarnen
Pamphlet Part III iteration II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part V iteration II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Stoneking's Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
endocasts and Broca's area GRMorton@aol.com
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Stoneking's Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
New phylum GRMorton@aol.com
Re: More Mortonian Eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
Tough love GRMorton@aol.com
Re: More Mortonian Eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Jim Bell
Re: "evolution" antithetical? Stephen Jones
Re: PC/TE #1 (was PC/TE definitions, misperceptions...) Stephen Jones
Re: ICR Home Page Stephen Jones
Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? (long) Stephen Jones
Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
Re: Books and Tapes by Professor Phillip E. Johnson Stephen Jones
Re: PC/TE #2 (was PC/TE definitions, misperceptions...) Stephen Jones
Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
Re: More Mortonian Eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
Re: "formless" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: historicity and "character issues" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: historicity and "character issues" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
Re: pamphlet Part III Stephen Jones
Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
Re: pamphlet part IV Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Stephen Jones
Re: An Apology For Stephen Jones Stephen Jones
Lunch hour philosophy on the Bible Bill Hamilton
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate II Brian D. Harper
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Bill Hamilton
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Jim Bell
Re: historicity and "character issues" Jim Bell
Re: historicity and "character issues" Bill Hamilton
Re: Broca's Area GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate II GRMorton@aol.com
New Phylum found GRMorton@aol.com
Re: historicity and "character issues" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate II Brian D. Harper
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
Books GRMorton@aol.com
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Apology to Glenn Morton vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: 1st Query and truth Steve Clark
Re: 1st Query and truth Jim Bell
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate Jim Bell
Re: Broca's Area Jim Foley
Re: Questions about endocasts of fossil hominid brains Jim Foley
Re: Genetic Similarity Jim Foley
Re: 1st Query and truth Bill Hamilton
Re: 1st Query and truth Steve Clark
Re: historicity and "character issues" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Last Word ;-) lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: PC/TE definitions, misperceptions, strengths, weaknesses lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: 1st Query and truth Jim Bell
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Bill Hamilton
Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Drawing Glenn Back Into Debate GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Questions about endocasts of fossil hominid brains GRMorton@aol.com
Re: 1st Query and truth Steve Clark
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Coincidences (was free will/determinism and God's plan Stephen Jones
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Stephen Jones
Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Stephen Jones
Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Stephen Jones
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Stephen Jones
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Stephen Jones
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Stephen Jones
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: Design, evolution and imperfection arguments Stephen Jones
Re: Genetic Similarity Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Re: Pamphlet Part II response 3 Stephen Jones
Re: Where is the List Archive? Stephen Jones
Truth? Jim Bell
1st Query (fwd) Gordon Simons
Re: pamphlet Part III Jim Foley
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam (Private) Jim Foley
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Steve Clark
Questions about endocasts of fossil hominid brains Bill Hamilton
Re: Last Word ;-) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: historicity and "character issues" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Stoneking's Eve GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Science or Poetry? GRMorton@aol.com
Stoneking's Eve Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Broca's Area (Update) vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part V, response I vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Stoneking's Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
historicity and "character issues" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: "evolution" antithetical? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
PC/TE definitions, misperceptions, strengths, weaknesses lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: pamphlet part IV DRATZSCH@legacy.calvin.edu
Re: A Confession of Sin ;-) Bill Hamilton
Re: Science or Poetry? Jim Bell
Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Brian D. Harper
Re: pamphlet Part III Brian D. Harper
Re: Broca's Area and Mitochondrial Eve GRMorton@aol.com
Science or Poetry? GRMorton@aol.com
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Archives for evolution@calvin.edu Terry M. Gray

Last message date: Wed 14 Feb 1996 - 09:52:08 EST
Archived on: Wed Feb 14 1996 - 09:54:30 EST

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.