Steve C:
>if we allow such
>broad definitions of science, then there is effectively no such thing as
>science. Anything can be called scientific simply because someone wishes
>it to be so.
Hi Steve C.
It seems your goal is to ensure that your definition of science prevails.
The goal of people supporting ID is to widen the definition. You fear
science will disappear if the possibility of teleology is allowed in a
scientific description of nature. That does define the battle lines.
Bertvan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 12 2000 - 19:51:03 EDT