>>>>
Bertvan:
I wouldn't limit science. Science should be free to investigate
astrology,
religion, psychology or anything else. "Dislike" doesn't describe my
attitude toward any of them. I'm simply not impressed with results so
far
achieved. I can even think of ways to try to scientifically investigate
religion, although I wouldn't be optimistic of much success. I don't
"dislike" "random mutation and natural selection". I don't feel the
evidence
supports it as a cause of macro evolution.
<<<<
Repeating myself, but the effect of religion can be investigated
statistically. These days many medical, biological, and physical studies
are statistical. Could even have blind studies. For example, we ask a
group of non-literate Christians in Africa to pray by name for half the
cancer patients at Sloan-Kettering without tellling the patients.
billwald@juno.com
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 08 2000 - 22:38:32 EDT