Adam and Eve

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 13:27:07 EDT

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Bear sacrifice"

Previous message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: Epicurean philosophy"
Next in thread: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Adrian Teo: "RE: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Adrian Teo: "RE: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Jim Eisele: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Has anyone challenged Dick Fischer's research? If no one
has disproved it, how can anyone in good conscience deny
the historicity of Adam? Dick has placed Adam where the
Bible does, with a heck of a lot of backup. God bless him.

Jim

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Bear sacrifice"
Previous message: Jonathan Clarke: "Re: Epicurean philosophy"
Next in thread: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Adrian Teo: "RE: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Adrian Teo: "RE: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Jim Eisele: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Reply: Dick Fischer: "Re: Adam and Eve"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 25 2002 - 17:38:59 EDT