RE: Adam and Eve

From: Adrian Teo (ateo@whitworth.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 12:42:04 EDT

  • Next message: Adrian Teo: "RE: Men before Adam"

    Hello Dick,

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Dick Fischer [mailto:dickfischer@earthlink.net]
    > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:30 PM
    > To: asa@calvin.edu
    > Subject: Re: Adam and Eve

    > There has been no method of apology that regards the first eleven
    > chapters of Genesis as having historical integrity, and at the same
    > time has respect for modern science. The only method that has worked
    > to date has been to assign early Genesis to some condescending
    > category such as allegory, poetry, tradition, mythology, fable, etc.
    > What I have tried to show is that early Genesis has been
    > misunderstood as a Hebrew rendition of the beginnings of mankind.
    > What I believe it to be is a Hebrew rendition of the history of the
    > Jewish race - not the human race.
    >
    > So I believe Genesis 2:4-11 is a fairly accurate historical narrative
    > of the Adamites-Semites who lived in southern Mesopotamia from about
    > 7,000 to about 4,000 years ago.

    Are you familiar with John Sailhamer's book Genesis Unbound, which seem to
    argue a similar point about interpretation of the Genesis account?



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 26 2002 - 12:52:42 EDT