Re: Historical evidence for Jesus

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Wed Oct 30 2002 - 14:22:04 EST

  • Next message: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu: "Re: Historical evidence for Jesus"

    Dick writes

    >Without evidence, I probably would not be a Christian at all. I could
    >chose between lots of contending religious beliefs that likewise would have
    >nothing to substantiate them. Who knows what I would pick? Something that
    >offered rewards with no sacrifice probably.

    Without evidence it is impossible to be a Christian. If you think the
    evidence scale is weighted 51-49 against Christianity, you are not a
    Christian. I would also suggest that if you don't consider anti-Christian
    evidence, then you're really not a Christian.

    One major problem with Christianity is that Jesus' return is 2000 years
    overdue (Mt 24:29-35, Mk 13:24-31, Luke 21:5-36, Rev 1:1-3).

    It's really all about the truth and trustworthiness. For practical
    purposes, Christianity takes huge hits every time a YEC opens his or
    her mouth. I used to equate Christianity with people who were honest
    truth-seekers. I guess I've grown up.

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question
    http://genesisinquestion.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 10:15:15 EST