Re: Historical evidence for Jesus

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Fri Nov 08 2002 - 13:55:57 EST

  • Next message: Jan de Koning: "Re: Historical evidence for Jesus"

    Michael writes

    >Not worried about myself . I dont the NT teaches an imminent return of
    >Christ in the 1st century.

    Is this becoming the kind of list where you just get to say whatever
    you want without any evidence or reasoning?

    >What worries me is the damage caused by fundamentalist/dispensational
    >teaching which forces an interpretation (and a dodgy one ) onto the NT.

    How straw is this man?

    >To Christians who start to question this can result in a domino effect
    >on their faith and perhpas it is happening to Jim.

    Forgive me for taking the text at it's word.

    >It is the same as insisting on a literal 6 day view of Genesis. When it
    >crumbles faith goes

    Maybe that is for the best.

    Again glad that I joined an agnostic list. The really blast people when
    they dance around the facts :-)

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question
    http://genesisinquestion.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 08 2002 - 20:43:41 EST