Re: [asa] YEC and ID arguments

"I have read vast amounts of YEC and ID literature of all sorts. As I unravelled any scientific argument in them (had to be geology as that is my field) I
found that they were ALWAYS marked by inaccuracies..." - Michael Roberts
   
  'They,' as the quote makes clear, refers only to YEC or ID arguments in geology (with absolutist language any argument, ALWAYS to boot!). Wouldn't it be nice if YEC or ID had to do only with geology...or with natural science only, for that matter? As if it/they had nothing to do information theory or psychology.
  
Please excuse if the 'blinded by one's worldview' brush paints both ways, in the sense that TE, ID and YEC all have ideological components - none is entirely neutral, i.e. just the facts without hermeneutics.
   
  Ifffff a person could make a case against evolution outside of Michael's discipline of choice, does anyone think he could get outside of his worldview to openly consider it as even a possibility?
   
  Sometimes, it really seems necessary to be defend ID and even YEC against TE's when they over-speak themselves (as rarely as that may be) in support of evolutionary universalism.
   
  G.A.

                 
---------------------------------
Share your photos with the people who matter at Yahoo! Canada Photos

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Oct 19 16:48:38 2006