I've been reading Angus Menuge's book "Agents Under Fire." His critique of
"strong" and "weak" agent reductionism is interesting in its own right. He
tries to bolster that critique with a broader critique of Darwinism based on
irreducible complexity. He responds to a number of standard objections to
IC, including the theory that apparently IC systems could have developed
through co-optation. His response to the co-optation scenario seems fairly
strong.
Why is co-optation considered a slam dunk in light of responses like
Menuge's? Also, aside from his critique of Darwinism, any thoughts on the
philosophical critique of SAR and WAR?
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Oct 19 16:41:08 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 19 2006 - 16:41:08 EDT