Hi all,
There's a review of "Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics"
(edited by Robert Pennock) in the latest issue of Science:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/295/5564/2373
Here are two interesting quotes:
"Johnson continues to conflate these two forms of naturalism even after
being called on the issue many times, but he has no choice. If he gives up
the conflation, he has lost, because he cannot call naturalism a
state-supported, established religion unless it explicitly denies the
existence of God."
"People like Plantinga and Johnson claim the high ground without earning
it, and so they seldom hold it long. Johnson believes that the more people
learn about the philosophy behind evolution, the less they'll like it.
Wait until they learn what's behind intelligent design."
Marcio
p.s.: By the way, there's a very interesting article on the same issue
entitled "Television Viewing and Aggressive Behavior During Adolescence
and Adulthood"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 28 2002 - 20:56:49 EST