Ironic isn't it? Or perhaps quite clever.
On 4/3/07, David Campbell <pleuronaia@gmail.com> wrote:
> My impression of Dawkins is that he actually is agreeing with popular
> Johnson and Wells style ID on a number of points, e.g., evolution or
> God, the validity of probabilistic arguments when we don't know the
> probabilities, and being certain about the way the facts should point
> allows you to confidently make up the facts. (Dawkins on religion and
> history is about as accurate as creation science on earth history).
> As they use similar arguments to prove opposite points, they together
> demonstrate that the arguments are props for a pre-established
> conclusion rather than an actually followed line of reasoning.
>
> --
> Dr. David Campbell
> 425 Scientific Collections
> University of Alabama
> "I think of my happy condition, surrounded by acres of clams"
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Apr 3 22:30:22 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 03 2007 - 22:30:22 EDT