Re: extra stuff

From: allenroy (allenroy@peoplepc.com)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 15:16:49 EDT

  • Next message: gordon brown: "Re: extra stuff"

    Michael Roberts wrote:

    > The problem is that the geological column is basically the same throughout
    > the world. I am personally familiar with it in the Grand Canyon, Black Hills
    > UK the Alps . Italy and South Africa. Others have found and seen that it is
    > the same elsewhere.

    At Grand Canyon, the geologic record shows a paraconformity [meaning, the
    contact is not visible or there is no evidence of erosion, w/ages differences
    defined by fossils] between the Muav Limestone and the Redwall limestone where
    100 million years of the Geologic Column are missing. S. Beus says that "the
    unconformity [paraconformity], even though representing more than 100 million
    years can be difficult to locate" (Beus, SS, 1990, Temple Butte Formation. In
    Beaus SS, Morales M, eds. 1990. Grand Canyon Geology, Oxford University Press, p
    107-117.)

    Also, "the location of the boundary between the Manakach and Wescogami
    formations [a 14 million year paraconformity] can be difficult to determine,
    both from a distance and from a close range." (Blakey RS. 1990. Supai group and
    Hermit formations. in Grand Canyon Geology [see above] p 147-182).

    This illustrates how imaginary the Geologic Column is, and illustrates the
    difference between the Geologic Record at Grand Canyon and the supposed Geologic
    Column.

    You will note [below] that I did not say Geologic Column was not generally the
    same from place to place, but that the Geologic Record is not the same from
    place to place. The Geologic Record (the formations what you actually see and
    find) at Grand Canyon is not the same record as found in other places even
    across the USA. So one would not expect to find the geologic record of a
    location in Africa, or Asia, or Australia to be the same. It's the imaginary
    Geologic Column which people claim to find all over the world.

    > > And, Creationists do not, in general, propose that the geologic record in,
    > say,
    > Grand Canyon, is going to be the same as in Africa, Asia or Australia.

    Allen



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 15 2003 - 15:17:25 EDT