Re: extra stuff

From: Keith Miller (kbmill@ksu.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 18:45:56 EDT

  • Next message: Steven M Smith: "Fruitcake analogy retraction (was RATE)"

    > Also, "the location of the boundary between the Manakach and Wescogami
    > formations [a 14 million year paraconformity] can be difficult to
    > determine,
    > both from a distance and from a close range." (Blakey RS. 1990. Supai
    > group and
    > Hermit formations. in Grand Canyon Geology [see above] p 147-182).

    I have personally examined this stratigraphic interval at its type
    locality. The reason it is hard to trace is that it is based on river
    channel deposits. There are large river channels with beautifully
    displayed cross stratification from lateral channel migration.
    However, the channel deposits are discontinuous in space just as they
    are in modern landscapes. Since the conglomeratic deposits at the base
    of the channel fills were used to define the boundary, these marker
    units must be correlated. As it turns out, if you trace the edges of
    the channels upward they merge into thick paleosols (fossil soils) that
    then continue on across the outcrop. The paleosols that we saw were
    very well-developed and represented an extended period of subaerial
    exposure and weathering. This is precisely what one would expect - and
    mirrors what is seen on landscapes today. Furthermore, the paleosols
    contain considerable amounts of pedogenic carbonate nodules (caliche
    nodules). These nodules were eroded and reworked by the stream
    channels and are found concentrated in the conglomerate channel lags.
    These surfaces recording extended times of subaerial exposure and
    weathering provide the basis for correlation. In sequence stratigraphy
    terminology, these are called "sequence boundaries."

    Paleosols are ubiquitous within the stratigraphic record. They have
    been the focus of much of my recent geological research. There are
    dozens and dozens of stacked paleosols within the Pennsylvanian and
    Permian sections of the midcontinent. In addition to their value in
    correlation, they provide excellent data on changing climates. There
    is a huge literature on paleosols and their interpretation.

    Keith

    Keith B. Miller
    Research Assistant Professor
    Dept of Geology, Kansas State University
    Manhattan, KS 66506-3201
    785-532-2250
    http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~kbmill/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 15 2003 - 18:46:18 EDT