RE: extra stuff

From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 06:30:49 EDT

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Phillip Johnson (and Methodological Naturalism)"

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    >Behalf Of allenroy
    >Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:17 PM

    >Allen Roy wrote:
    >This illustrates how imaginary the Geologic Column is, and illustrates the
    >difference between the Geologic Record at Grand Canyon and the
    >supposed Geologic
    >Column.
    >
    >You will note [below] that I did not say Geologic Column was not
    >generally the
    >same from place to place, but that the Geologic Record is not the same from
    >place to place. The Geologic Record (the formations what you
    >actually see and
    >find) at Grand Canyon is not the same record as found in other places even
    >across the USA. So one would not expect to find the geologic record of a
    >location in Africa, or Asia, or Australia to be the same. It's
    >the imaginary
    >Geologic Column which people claim to find all over the world.
    >
    >> > And, Creationists do not, in general, propose that the
    >geologic record in,
    >> say,
    >> Grand Canyon, is going to be the same as in Africa, Asia or Australia.

    I have been too busy on another list to pay much attention to statements
    showing ignorance of the geologic column here. Allen, you should be aware
    of my documentation of the entire geologic column existing in 30 basins
    around the world. I list them, I put them on a map for perusal. And you
    ignore them. I give references. and you don't mention them. This page has
    been cited in YEC literature so it isn't like it isn't known of. Show me
    where it is wrong. YOu can go check up on it. But of course, you won't. And
    if you do you will repeat silly stuff like that above.

    I also issued a challenge to you that you didn't reply to. I bet you didn't
    even look at the pictures I have linked to at the bottom of the page
    http://home.entouch.net/dmd/genesis.htm

    This illustrates why dealing with you is a meaningless exercise. If you
    think you have some answer (which ignores lots of evidence but you think you
    can get away with it), you reply. If you have no answer, you remain silent.
    That is simply intellectual dishonesty. Is that what you think Christianity
    is all about?



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 16 2003 - 06:31:13 EDT