Re: verification that makes a difference

From: George Andrews Jr. (gandrews@as.wm.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:29:57 EST

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Discussion of Dembski's paper"

    Hi Paul:

    PHSEELY@aol.com wrote:

    > Glenn wrote:
    >
    > << Does anyone have any fact that is verifiable about Christianity which makes
    > a difference to the central issue of God invading history?
    >
    > Only by an affirmative, can we totally escape the issue of faith based upon
    > faith.
    > >>
    >
    > The underlying question is important; and I was trying to think of how I
    > would answer it. I tried to think if proving that the Flood occured would
    > answer the question; and concluded it would only be of tangential value
    > because even if the Flood were proven by say finding the ark with a tablet
    > inside with Noah's name on it as well as sedimentary remains of the Flood in
    > all the right places at the right time, that would still leave as possible
    > contenders as the true religion: Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Bahai,
    > Mormonism and Jehovah's Witnesses.
    >
    > I conclude, therefore, that appeal to the New Testament record of the words
    > and deeds of Jesus and especially the resurrection would go further in the
    > right direction. This need not include any claim that the historical record
    > per se is a revelation from God; but, only that it is a historical document,
    > like the writings of Livy or Suetonius, and just as much entitled to respect
    > as such as they are--- if not more because of their close proximity in time
    > to eye-witnesses of the life and teachings of Jesus. Such an appeal to
    > historical documents along with those archaeological finds such as the
    > inscription with Pilate's name which lend authenticity to the accounts
    > escapes the charge that one is basing faith in Christ on faith alone. The
    > historical documents of the NT are _objective_ evidences of the real
    > historical existence, life and teachings of Jesus; so Christianity is not
    > depending on subjective experiences alone. It is not a faith based on faith
    > alone.
    >
    > Paul

    But Paul, as George M. points out in another (patient) response to Glenn, while
    reason and evidence play important roles in our religion, a "leap of faith" at
    some point is required. Historical accuracy as to the person of Christ does not
    necessitate a belief in his Divinity. Is it not so that "without faith it is
    impossible to please God?"

    Our faith is distingueshed from other faiths not by its varifyibility - but by it
    being a gift of personal revelation by God to us NOW. "Blessed" are we who
    believe that Jesus is the Christ, for flesh and blood have not revealed this to
    us; but Jesus' Father who is in heaven!

    n'est pas?

    George A.

    --
    George A. Andrews Jr.
    Physics/Applied Science
    College of William & Mary
    P.O. Box 8795
    Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:27:04 EST