In a message dated 20/11/00 19:14:21 GMT Standard Time, nalonso@ecal.com
writes:
Nelson:
When you have responded to the same criticism over and over again, and when
they refuse to respond to other IDers , but just respond to Dembski, then
you kinda get the feeling that there is something more going on. Let Wesley
and Rich publish their material in the forums Dembski provided, then they
will be taken seriously. Otherwise, their motivation is obvious.
Paul Robson:
It is highly questionable whether it is to the advantage of IDers to question
other people's motives. (I am aware BTW that you are one of the few IDers
to whom this does not apply)
Whilst I would not in any way claim to be a saint, Nelse, I do remember
you not answering my probability question rather a lot ;-)
There are some playground ethics here. It doesn't actually *matter*
if Richard Wein called Dembski all the names under the sun. It
is a question of Dembski's arguments.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 21 2000 - 04:25:55 EST