Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics

From: AutismUK@aol.com
Date: Tue Nov 21 2000 - 04:25:48 EST

Next message: AutismUK@aol.com: "Re: ID and Creationism"

Previous message: AutismUK@aol.com: "Re: Politeness"
Next in thread: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In a message dated 20/11/00 20:23:16 GMT Standard Time, billwald@juno.com
writes:

<< I propose this situation arose because science pays better than
phillosophy. >>

Well, this obviously isn't true. You can make money much more easily
writing a book called "Why Evolution is Lies" rather than "Why
Creationism is Lies" (or Atheism/Christianity). Doesn't matter about
the content of the book, of course.

Next message: AutismUK@aol.com: "Re: ID and Creationism"
Previous message: AutismUK@aol.com: "Re: Politeness"
Next in thread: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 21 2000 - 04:25:59 EST