To: evolution Subject: Re: Life
At 03:20 PM 06/05/2000 -0400, you wrote:
Steve C:
>It is a mystery to me why you think science can explain everything.>
>Bertvan:
>I don't believe science can explain everything. I don't believe science has
>explained evolution and should not pretent "random mutation and natural
>selection" does so. If science can't explain life, science has no business
>demanding their guesses as to how evolution might have happened be presented
>to children as "fact".
So if science can't explain everything (and it is *you* who say that
scientists say science can potentially explain everything, not scientists)
then it shouldn't be allowed to explain anything. I see.
Is it ok with you if the *evidence* for evolution be presented? Or should
that be discarded because it disproves your point?
Susan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 05 2000 - 22:16:56 EDT