re: Life

From: Susan Brassfield (susanb@telepath.com)
Date: Mon Jun 05 2000 - 21:47:50 EDT

  • Next message: Steve Clark: "re: Life"

    To: evolution Subject: Re: Life
    At 03:20 PM 06/05/2000 -0400, you wrote:
    Steve C:
    >It is a mystery to me why you think science can explain everything.>

    >Bertvan:
    >I don't believe science can explain everything. I don't believe science has
    >explained evolution and should not pretent "random mutation and natural
    >selection" does so. If science can't explain life, science has no business
    >demanding their guesses as to how evolution might have happened be presented
    >to children as "fact".

    So if science can't explain everything (and it is *you* who say that
    scientists say science can potentially explain everything, not scientists)
    then it shouldn't be allowed to explain anything. I see.

    Is it ok with you if the *evidence* for evolution be presented? Or should
    that be discarded because it disproves your point?

    Susan



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 05 2000 - 21:48:05 EDT