>Long after ID is the majority assumption in the US, England will be stuck in
>the dark age of "random mutation and natural selection". Why? England
>doesn't have an ACLU.
England has a state church. You, as an agnostic living in England would
have your taxes go to support a religion in which you did not believe. The
writers of our constitution thought that was a tad unfair. I agree. So does
the ACLU and if you were smart, you would agree also.
>Below are excerpts from the newspaper article:
>Bertvan
>
>http://www.skagitvalleyherald.com/daily/00/may/28/a1dehart.html
>Skagit Valley Herald, Sunday,
>
>School officials throw extra science materials out of class
> Teacher has been at center of local evolution debate.
this story leaves out a bit:
>Though unable to comment Friday, Vander Veen had earlier in the week
>expressed frustration that DeHart had presented the five articles to her
>on May 3 -- a month after the district's deadline for supplemental
>reading matter to be reviewed by the Instructional Material Committee.
DeHart KNEW when the dealine was, and deliberately submitted the articles a
month late. Wonder why? and wonder who called the press? OPPRESSION! RIGHT
HERE IN RIVER CITY!!!
Susan
----------
For if there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing
of life as in hoping for another and in eluding the implacable grandeur of
this one.
--Albert Camus
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 30 2000 - 17:47:36 EDT