RE: Evolutionary Information 1/2

Roddy (rvagg@grug.une.edu.au)
Wed, 22 Jul 1998 15:27:33 +1000 (EST)

On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Pim van Meurs wrote:

=> Please explain how you come to this conclusion ? The observations
supporting evolution are countless and there is no evidence of an non-natural process.

Wait a minuite.. Natural Evidence for a non-natural process, would this
be logical? Must christians accept the boundaries set down by science to
have valid views? Seems to me that the boundaries and restrictions placed
down by science directs its own "evolution" to the conclusion that we
are the highest living beings therefore we are supreme, ie: God! Exactly
the trap Adam and Eve first fell into and exactly the thing Satan was
kicked out of heaven for! I say, better be careful..

-- Roddy

=> ----------
=> >>>>But what or whoever surely appears to have worked through a natural
=> evolutionary process.<<<
=>
=> Ron: no it doesn't.
=>

---Roddy Vagg, Computer Guy, SRSNR, UNE. Ph: 61 2 67 733978
--- "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoeverbelieves in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did notsend his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the worldthrough him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever doesnot believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in thename of God's one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has comeinto the world, but men loved darkness instead of the light for fearthat his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comesinto the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has donehas been done through God." (John 3:16-21)
---