Re: Pejudice? Cowardice? Re: A Peace Proposal

Dawsonzhu@aol.com wrote:

> Walter Hicks wrote:
>
>
>> And I do NOT believe that Glenn is justified in slamming YECs just
>> because of
>> his experience with a select group. How about identifying the people
>> of whom you
>> speak and criticize them BY NAME instead of by a category that
>> includes a lot
>> of sensible people. If afraid to identify the person, at least say
>> the ICR or
>> the AiG instead of the general term of YECs.
>
> Whereas your general complaint sticks to varying degrees
> to various people on this list (including myself), Glenn
> is very meticulous about citing names, quotes and
> references. I don't even know how he does it without
> spending several hours at it sometimes.
>
> Point well taken that we (posters to ASA list serve) set a bad example
>
> when we show no reservations about stooping to the generic "they"
> (like Creationist and other groups of ___all___ kinds also tend to
> do),
> but I think you really got a bit carried away in this rant.

"Rant"? What ME rant!? Glenn and Michael may rant but Wally is always
cool, calm and collected ;)

I apologize for getting "carried away" -- but not for the sentiment
expressed.

I have also apologized for implying that Glenn or others _never_ name
the persons at fault. But to do that consistently would be a better
strategy for all concerned (IMO).

Cool Wally

--
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================