From: Jim Armstrong (jarmstro@qwest.net)
Date: Sat Nov 08 2003 - 12:05:22 EST
My apologies - I thought I had checked the originating list. Sorry - I
try to be careful about that.
My process is evidently neither redundant, error-correcting, nor
fail-safe!
JimA
Denyse O'Leary wrote:
> I can reply only briefly today due to other commitments, but the main
> point of the thought exercise is to demonstrate that an assumption of
> design has no impact on the ability to study a phenomenon, as has been
> claimed.
>
> Design, in the instance of the spacecraft, is not seen only through
> the eyes of faith. It is a matter of evidence.
>
>
> I appreciate the spacecraft lingo and will work it in.
>
> By the way, did I post this to the ASA list? I thought I had posted it
> to the design or chance list.
>
> Oh, well. This is as good a time as any to point out the existence of
> the design or chance Yahoo discussion group, if anyone is looking for
> a discussion group dedicated only to these issues.
>
> Denyse
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 08 2003 - 12:08:38 EST