Re: The Faculties of the Soul (was Re: The Iota Subscript)

From: richard@biblewheel.com
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 13:53:30 EST

  • Next message: Vernon Jenkins: "So what?!"

    Hi Blake,

    I really understand your frustration. Believe me, I feel exactly the same
    way. I listed seven of the most obvious ways that the Bible Wheel helps
    transport the children of God to the hospital (to continue the analogy.)
    Have you responded to a single one of them? Even one?

    The unfortunate answer is no. You have not even acknowledged, let alone
    addressed, any of the points I gave in direct answer to your questions.

    I would be delighted to continue the conversation if you were to make an
    effort to respond to what I say. Otherwise, your suggestion that the
    conversation end is probably a good one. If it must end, it would be nice to
    have it end gracefully.

    Thanks for the discussion. Your efforts are appreciated.

    Richard Amiel McGough
    Discover the sevenfold symmetric perfection of the Holy Bible at
    http://www.BibleWheel.com

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Dr. Blake Nelson" <bnelson301@yahoo.com>
    To: <richard@biblewheel.com>
    Cc: "ASA" <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:09 AM
    Subject: Re: The Faculties of the Soul (was Re: The Iota Subscript)

    > Richard,
    >
    > In your response, you assume a lot of things about my
    > questions that I did not intend. I won't bother to
    > address them point by point, because it seems beside
    > the point.
    >
    > --- richard@biblewheel.com wrote:
    > > Dr. Nelson wrote:
    > >
    > > > It seems to me, despite your representation
    > > > that their are infinite ramifications, the
    > > > one ramification that you have explicated is
    > > > that you believe it demonstrates that the
    > > > Bible is beyond doubt God inspired.
    > > > Something that lots of people have believed
    > > > without your analysis.
    > >
    > > Proof of the Bible is a logical consequence of the
    > > validity of the Bible
    > > Wheel, just as the existence of a car is proof that
    > > someone designed it. But
    > > the car was not designed merely to prove it had a
    > > designer. The car was
    > > designed for the much higher purpose. It can save
    > > lives when properly used,
    > > transporting wounded people to the hospital,
    > > providing food, and so forth.
    > > It would be good for nothing if it sat enshrined in
    > > the Temple of the Car as
    > > proof of the existence of the great and mighty "Car
    > > Designer." Nobody would
    > > ever think to assert that any car was ever designed
    > > merely to prove the
    > > banal fact that it was designed.
    >
    > I think this is a matter of semantics and misses my
    > point since it puts an interpretation on my question
    > that wasn't there. To use your analogy, how does the
    > Bible Wheel show more ways in which the Bible can be
    > used to take people to the hospital, provide food, and
    > so forth in a way that was not the case before the
    > Bible Wheel?
    >
    > I suspect this will be my last question and post on
    > the subject. Thanks for the answers.
    >
    > (SNIP)
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > __________________________________
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
    > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 04 2003 - 14:39:48 EST