Dr. Campbell,
Saying it is so simply says you disagree, which is fine.
But it does not make it so.
The explanations around entropy are forced. =20
A Soviet doing anything is suspect until it is duplicated by peers. Has =
it been?
Even if it has, it is a far cry from laboratory artificial hybridization =
to increased complexity. Both parents lose, information, they do not =
gain.
You believe in transition, I believe in extinction of co-existing =
competitors, like Lucy.
Taxonomical grouping and evolutionary theoretical descent are linked to =
a great degree.
Increased entropy by increased complexity? I think not. =20
Peking man is an example of great suppositions based on the scantest of =
evidence, lost save for casts. And since then we only have grab bags of =
small parts from several specimens mixed and hypothetically assembled. =
Competing species or antecedent? Interspecies love? =20
Evolutionists too must take much on faith alone.
Jay
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 11 2002 - 01:51:49 EDT