Mike Satterlee wrote:
>My friend Dick Fischer, who I greatly respect and who might be having a bad
>day, wrote: An early Adam works for Glenn, a late Adam works for me, and
>along comes Mike who prefers two Adams over one.
>
>What was that? I have never suggested such a thing. I believe there was only
>one biblical man who was named "Adam." His creation by God is clearly
>described in Genesis chapter two. I simply believe that Genesis 1:26-30,
>which does not mention the man "Adam," is describing God's creation of the
>human race prior to His creation of "Adam." Such an understanding hardly
>amounts to believing in "two Adams."
Whether you choose to translate 'adam as "Adam" or "man," I can assure it is
the same 'adam throughout Genesis. In other words, 'adam in Genesis 1:27
is nameless in your opinion?
Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 21:31:32 EDT